<p>No they weren’t but whatever you need to believe</p>
<p>On 6 October 2002, the CIA elaborated on why the sentence should be removed:</p>
<p>The evidence is weak …The procurement is not particularly significant to Iraq’s nuclear ambitions because the Iraqis already have a large stock of uranium oxide in their inventory … and we have shared points one and two with Congress, telling them the Africa story is overblown and telling them this one of the two issues where we differed with the British."</p>
<p>Guess the state department, the CIA, the INR, are not part of the American Intelligence Agencies, but an Allgerian Business man, and a Iraqi scientist, a known liar, are</p>
<p>Cool</p>