<p>No need to search for a pony when it is presented in full clarity:</p>
<p>“CIA Iraq nuclear analysts and the Director of WINPAC told Committee staff that at the time of the State of the Union, they still believed that Iraq was probably seeking uranium from Africa”</p>
<p>Plus other gems which unambiguously show that the consensus of the IC was that the nuclear program was being reconstituted. And even a full discussion of your main “sticking point” about why they referred to the British intelligence rather than the US intelligence. </p>
<p>There’s not just a single pony but a whole herd of them, all saddled up and ready to romp with those having an open mind.</p>
<p>I guess I’m at a rhetorical loss to match your analogy, but 3 Blind Mice may have to do to describe those like yourself with self-applied blinders that prohibit them from seeing the truth. </p>
<p>kluge, it’s a shame that bitterness can cloud the mind to such an extent. When I see your posts on the Duke thread I see a very intelligent lawyer. Unfortunately, on this thread, you are reduced to having no facts to support your view so you resort to the only tool that a lawyer can fall back upon - attempt to discredit the report and the person delivering the report. However, with no facts to do even that, you create your own.</p>