<p>If I remember the Q correctly the Q was something like wht if proven true would most weaken the quoted lines of passage 1</p>
<p>AnonAnnay! Thanks! I hope we get awesome marks, and then we celebrate :D</p>
<p>ccprofile:
agree.
What I remember is that the question is only about P1.</p>
<p>What do you guys remember about the question itself?</p>
<p>ccprofile:
agree.
What I remember is that the question is only about P1.</p>
<p>What do you guys remember about the question itself?</p>
<p>Why is my post before the older post? so strange</p>
<p>@numen finder:
“Why is my post before the older post? so strange”</p>
<p>That has been happening since the beginning of the thread.</p>
<p>“what if proven correct would most likely weaken the quoted lines of passage 1”</p>
<p>what were the quoted lines? </p>
<p>Anyways that just supports the answer for court life. Court life is the strongest one that would weaken the argument of passage 1.</p>
<p>Maybe the quoted lines had no mention of lancing stuff…just about chivalry and court life!</p>
<p>@numen finder: Its not just this thread…its all of CC!</p>
<p>^^ Hooray! If you guys are correct, then my “court life” answer is right!
Hopefully…</p>
<p>At one point the author mentioned something like the books tht he had written showed knowledge of things like lancing,…etc. and at tht time only a privileged class of people could have had tht knowledge.</p>
<p>I’m not totally sure tht there was a quoted line, I just used the reference as an example of wht kind of question actually appeared.</p>
<p>It is definitely not only about court life.
But every other things about aristocratic life.</p>
<p>I remember this written in the passage, that resources were available to sheaky through which he got knowledge…</p>
<p>Btw, we would never find out which one it actually was. I dont think the SAS shows answers…=(</p>
<p>Edward De Vere the person who might be shakespear.
The scholar said because of court, and other things (which I cannot remember) only he could not think of other person who could be.</p>
<p>I really think it has to do with court life. It makes sense because it would imply that whoever Shakey may be, he would know a thing or two about what happens in the court (court in the context of “imperial courts”). I do not think it’s the option with aristocratic background because the passages themselves are debating about Shakey’s background.</p>
<p>There are quoted lines which is the opinion of a scholar (David or sth)</p>
<p>SAS shows answers.</p>
<p>Numen I don’t think you understand what the question is asking for.</p>
<p>it is asking for a specific example that would counter the argument of passage 1, which argues that Shaky the farmer schmuck was a fraud, because there was no way he could have learned all that crap about war, court life, law, etc. The court life answer choice would be one specific example that would counter passage 1 the most, out of all the other answer choices.</p>
<p>how the heck is the “most playwrights are aristocratic” logically relevant? We’re focused on Shaky alone. the only way that could be right is if it said “absolutely all playwrights from this time period are all aristocratic.” I mean the passage itself establishes that he was some farmer schmuck. Maybe those other aristocratic playwrights visited this farmer to teach him about everything he’s suppose to know?</p>
<p>also you make the assumption that all aristocrats are educated in the wide range of things Shakespeare had to know, but the passage never mentions anything about the education of aristocrats during this time period. you are making an assumption that was never mentioned in either passages</p>
<p>^ amen to that</p>
<p>Yes, court is related.
But it’s just TOO PARTIAL.</p>
<p>this question should only be based on the quoted lines of that scholar.
court is ONLY PART of it.</p>