<p>Token, you are of course correct. A 1-2% increase in low income kids can be huge as a % of a % (and will receive full page articles in the NYT, and Globe). But, a 1% increase is not very material, and could have easily been achieved under the former early policies if the schools chose to do so.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>hahahahahaha</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Not so in California at least last time I looked, but that was two years ago… </p>
<p>IMO, the results from the public UVa should not be compared to the results from the two privates, since it is in their State interest to at least move towards a par with other state Unis (UMich, UNC) with regards to low income kids (Pell Grantees).</p>