<p>This has been debated ad infinitum, it is part of the wars over nature versus nurture, where there were those saying everything was a cultural construct, that nothing was inate, while there were those saying that especially with gender roles and such, it was totally hardcoded. </p>
<p>I think most people think it is a combination of both and I agree it is. However, I also think that what boys and girls in general are attracted to are influenced more often then we think innately. I think, for example, that girls do tend to be more attracted to dolls then let’s say toy cars or trucks, and that when a little girl plays with a car, they tend to play with them differently then boys do. It doesn’t mean there aren’t boys who like dolls, or girls who like trucks, I a just saying I think there are differences on the whole in what they choose and how they play with them.</p>
<p>Personally, I think what parents should do is give the kids a lot of choices and let them gravitate to what they like, and don’t worry about it. When we gave our son gifts growing up, it ranged from toys like trucks and cars, but he had stuffed animals (that he had a whole world with, with elected officials, organized events, etc), he had a toy kitchen he liked a lot, we tried him on a lot of things. If parents buy their daughter legos and she likes them in pastel colors better, then buy them that way, if she doesn’t care, but legos that are all colors. </p>
<p>I have heard all the arguments, that even where parents try to be gender neutral they are giving off subtle hints and so forth, but I don’t buy it, I have observed enough kids, kids raised by parents really concerned about gender stereotyping, who for example stayed away from the pink and blue thing, and to their astonishment they found that the girls and boys still tended to head that way, despite what they tried to do. One couple I know of is a family where there are two moms, both of whom are pretty kind of gender neutral people (neither masculine/butch nor particularly femme), and one of their daughters is the princess type girly girl, the other one is more tomboyish, and their son loves gi joes and trucks, even though he had the option of playing with a wide range of toys, as did his sisters, they never made the distinction between boy and girl toys, they kind of bought them ‘for the family’ so to speak, and it still played out like that.</p>
<p>And sometimes it fails even when you try…in the 1950’s Lionel came out with what they called the ‘girl’s train set’ , it was all in pink, I kid you not…and didn’t go over well, pink or not, trains tended not to be something girls gravitated towards.</p>