***Oct 2014 SAT (US ONLY)***

<p>@MSJKID So what did you put? Potentially altruistic? </p>

<p>@caninotgotocoll Nope, it means “emitted”. </p>

<p>@landsharkk That’s what I put too. But now I think of it, when he kind of looked at the five kids, didn’t he seem measured? Like he knew exactly what to say to get them to buy the car?</p>

<p>could someone pm the google docs? thnx</p>

<p>@FuzzyPeaches22 “Measured” means deliberate and restrained. Sonny may have been calculating, but there wasn’t really anything to suggest that he was measured. </p>

<p>Does anyone know about the “extrapolated” question? I saw something about it a few pages back but don’t remember it.</p>

<p>@landsharkk I think it was the architecture passage. Something like “archeologists can tell something something by looking at details”. The answer is extrapolate. </p>

<p>@FuzzyPeaches22 no I put inherently useful </p>

<p>@FuzzyPeaches22 Was that the short passage with only two questions? What was the entire question? </p>

<p>I’m pretty nervous about the CR…</p>

<p>@landsharkk Yep, it was. One was “tangibility” and the other was “extrapolate”.</p>

<p>Same! My math is probably going to be 650-700 so I really need that 800 in critical reading. As of now, genial/ingratiating, obvious/altruistics, and the gymnastics one (which statement would the author agree with) are the ones I’m confused on. Pretty sure I got everything else right. But to get a 800 I can only get two wrong…</p>

<p>Do you guys think the curves for reading and math will be slightly more generous this time or nah?</p>

<p>I had 2 25 minute writing sections. Was the 25 minute writing section with the crossfit and athletes passage experimental or legit? I’m just wondering because I’m less confident about my answers from this section than the other.</p>

<p>The curve is nothing lol.</p>

<p>@APlife That one was legit. </p>

<p>@APlife My 25 minute writing section had a passage about athletic training for amateurs and pros, so if that’s what you’re referring to, yes. </p>

<p>My experimental section was really obvious. It was a 25 minute, 18 question writing section consisting of one really long passage.</p>

<p>Could it not be problematic instead?</p>

<p>@FuzzyPeaches22 I think I might’ve put “simplification” for that one because the archaeologists were simplifying architecture into its constituent materials. Gah, might’ve rushed that one.</p>

<p>I really hope there’ll be a good curve. The reading passages were easy to understand, but so many questions seemed to have two right answers. </p>

<p>how u get it?</p>

<p>can anyone explain how u get thed overlapped circle question?</p>

<p>@landsharkk I had the same experimental. It was way easy; I wish it hadn’t been experimental. Writing as a whole was easy though.</p>

<p>@MSJKID OH MY GOD you’re the only other person (besides me) in this entire thread who chose inherently useful… just praying that my interpretation is in line with CB’s</p>

<p>MATH PROBLEM HELP PLEASE! hi! What was the answer to the two sides bar graph that asked about the degree ( temperature) I think at the year 2001? I think I choose D)82 - but I’m not sure - </p>