<p>No, you subtract one for the overlap</p>
<p>Ah, thanks.</p>
<p>what overlap?</p>
<p>1983 for the president?</p>
<p>I, II, III for the blocks of different shapes and colors?</p>
<p>1983 for president I put 1981…
only II of green cubes</p>
<p>1983
II only</p>
<p>That’s like 2 wrong :(. What would be my estimated Math score with 2 wrong?</p>
<p>like 740…</p>
<p>For the one that said “humans would prefer practically any object over scattered points,” i answered that the author included this line to explain the origins of an impulse.
that line was from the first paragraph, and in the first paragraph, the author writes about the eyes only… then he/she goes on to talk about the brain’s role in vision/creating objects out of random points. so doesn’t that make sense? he/she had to introduce the origin of our tendency to create forms out of random points before talking about it, no?</p>
<p>i just don’t see how it could be the strength or the flexibility of the mind…</p>
<p>But the objects themselves aren’t the origins of the impulse…</p>
<p>Having ascended to ridge or The climbers ascended to the ridge?</p>
<p>C or E?</p>
<p>E was a comma splice huh? :(</p>
<p>I think origin of impulse is stretching it too far and strength of response in sense is stretching it little. They only thing they talk about directly is the mind…</p>
<p>fail…redundancy for the complex machine sentence completion?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Having ascended to ridge.</p>
<p>^ yes…</p>
<p>Having ascended is what I put</p>
<p>I still think that strength of response fits better with the passage’s theme overall</p>
<p>Improving sentences</p>
<p>Either of the cars well worth its price I think C?
Either of the cars well worth the price I think E?</p>
<p>I put C…</p>
<p>well worth its price, definitely.</p>