<p>i’d challenge </p>
<p>Rewilding
-ethical issue because humans probably had a part in it</p>
<p>It did say that the extinction took place a long time ago, and then said how future generation can be affected by it. so the answer should be not b.c humans had part in it but b.c the relationships with other species affect people or sth like that.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p>In the thriving Sentence completion, there was a second word with it. I think it was harsh. “Thriving…harsh”</p>
<p>something like lada lada 100 Black Rhinos were ------- in the red desert despite its ------- conditions.</p>
<p>
Something about how a spaceship was all filled up and no space was wasted.</p>
<p>Also for the log cabin one “short lived”</p>
<p>It was actually phrased “hapiness would not last” on the test right?</p>
<p>
The question was something like: no space had been wasted because everything had a purpose</p>
<p>guys PLEASE explain why its “genuine” instead of “necessary” i don’t get it.</p>
<p>
Yes</p>
<p>
I believe you’re right. It might have been something like the 100 black rhinos are thriving despite the harsh conditions.</p>
<p>
Yup.
@XCR- Thanks for the thriving…harsh recollection, I got that right.</p>
<p>I put that the anecdote in the critics passage served to transition to author’s beliefs or something like that.</p>
<p>also, is the discerning others one confirmed? so virtually no one wouldn’t work?
was it agreed which passages are the experimentals?</p>
<p>finally, did everyone agree that it was disagreement? i put lack of objective judgment</p>
<p>I think it was actually hostile conditions for that one with thriving.</p>
<p>What was the question and other answer choices for the movie critic passage “-sentence __ shows that she had detractors”</p>
<p>@antonioray - i have oscar and objectively answers too, tho i am not positive. Can it happen that we are right and everyone else is wrong? lol</p>
<p>yeah, can anyone explain the discerning movie goers answer?</p>
<p>
The pianist said that he doesn’t purposely play accurately, he plays to be dazzling. (Or something like that.) Just the same, the biographer wouldn’t be completely factual (accurate) and he would write artistically. This is confirmed, correct?</p>
<p>
I also think so.</p>
<p>Yes boston you are corrrect.</p>
<p>“yeah, can anyone explain the discerning movie goers answer?”</p>
<p>please :(</p>
<p>
I’d say -4 could be 750/760 and -5 is 750/740. But those are just my predictions</p>
<p>
Reading comprehension fail.</p>
<p>pretty please :/</p>
<p>Wasn’t the second word of the thriving choice “hostile”?</p>