<p>Yeah I’m not that good either. In March I got 3 wrong (so -4) and a 9 essay and that was a 710. I thought that was a tad harsh but is that normal?</p>
<p>I would think -4 and 9 would be around 720ish.</p>
<p>yeah crzygmer, that’s what i am expecting for mine.
But just in case worst things happened, what would be 8 essay -4 wrong??<br>
I don’t even wanna think about this… but who knows.</p>
<p>there was a question where one of the choices was practically any. i chose ne for that one. did anyone else remember that and whatd you guys get</p>
<p>@megafoxftw i put another choice for that question.</p>
<p>@megafoxftw that was ne</p>
<p>****. i guess i got that wrong. damn it</p>
<p>This forum requires that you wait 60 seconds between posts. Please try again in 38 seconds. blah blah blah</p>
<p>so there were 2 ne? mammal and that one?</p>
<p>nice memory meganfoxftw. can you remember any other part of that sentence?</p>
<p>Did people really hate the essay?</p>
<p>does “would of” ring a bell?
And what about “Although the debaters said that the debate was insighful (?), to some it was confusing”</p>
<p>For the mammal one, I think the choices were pratically any, dominant, the fact, and something else?</p>
<p>Would of was supposed to be would have.</p>
<p>I remember the debaters q, but nothing more than what you wrote already.</p>
<p>Yes, “would of” was a mistake, I believe on #27, but don’t quote me on it.</p>
<p>Ah I put NE for that. (the practically any question) I remember there was “the fact” in one of my NEs.</p>
<p>@boston do you remember putting A for that question?</p>
<p>
You just got quoted, punk.
:P</p>
<p>
Nah, I don’t recall the letter, only that I underlined ‘would of’</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the rest of the sentence with “practically any” in it?</p>
<p>No (pun)k intended? :D</p>
<p>I don’t recall the ‘practically any’ question whatsoever.</p>