<p>Took this from Polyosophy:
Attempt at Consolidated List</p>
<p>Mammals- dead split between NE or not.
so poor-poorly
vegetables- By comparison
Plus being-incorrect (one i am unsure about)
While still making -(should be make parallel structure )
Would of (Should be would have)
that (should be those) modified: lives of women
among my friends and I -(among my friends and me)
emphasizing on-(should be emphasis)
tornado-unsure
vegetables-(insert proponents)
confirmed-(should be to confirm)
kindergarten soul mates- (each instead of he)
professor-(issued)
frequency-(were reduced was error), should be was
astonishing-should be astonishingly
Role of actor-place considered his best role yet, at beginning
but also because (i am unsure, but i believe this is correct)
best concluding sentence (majority chose ultimately it’s up to consumers to decide if low environmental impact justifies cost of orgnic food)
when few were receiving formal training in the european tradition (anyone can consolidate)?</p>
<p>Polyosophy got 1 NE besides mammals one.
I chose NE for mammals as the only NE.
Update this list, as you please.</p>
<p>For the Amusement park one, should be Amusement parks are fun places for families to visit, not Amusement parks are a fun place for families to visit</p>
<p>I thought this was confirmed? Should be “…resulting from a change in direction or wind speed”</p>
<p>the participle resulting modifies the noun tornadoes. “As a result” is unnecessary when you can just say “resulting” so that’s why the former option is incorrect.</p>
<p>“so poor” is fine the way it is. “so” is an adverb and “poor” is an adjective. Adverbs modify adjectives. Grammatically, there’s nothing wrong with “so poor”</p>
<p>GUYS PLEASE ANSWER THIS FOR ME. WAS THE EXPERIMENTAL WRITING SECTION 4 OR 5? i’m pretty sure its 4…i remember number 12 on section 4 was like…the boys scouts gossiping about other peers…AHHHHHHHHHHHH PLEASE!</p>
<p>Mammals-Unsure, am told NE.
so poor-poorly
vegetables- By comparison
Plus being-incorrect (one i am unsure about)
While still maintaining -(should be maintain)
Would of (Should be would have)
its (should be those) I believe talking about voices of women
among my friends and I -among my friends and me
emphasizing-(should be emphasis)
tornado-unsure
vegetables-(insert proponents)
confirmed-(should be to confirm)
kindergarten soul mates- (each instead of he)
professor-(issued)
frequency-(were reduced was error), should be was
astonishing-should be astonishingly
Role of actor-place considered his best role yet, at beginning
but also because (i am unsure, but i believe this is correct)</p>
<p>yes for “not only because…but also because…”
I remember the tornado answer got rid of the comma and just had “as a result of” I think
“plus being” = incorrect</p>
<p>vegetables - “by comparison”??? I had “indeed”, don’t even remember considering “by comparison”</p>
<p>**GUYS PLEASE ANSWER THIS FOR ME. WAS THE EXPERIMENTAL WRITING SECTION 4 OR 5? i’m pretty sure its 4…i remember number 12 on section 4 was like…the boys scouts gossiping about other peers…AHHHHHHHHHHHH PLEASE! **</p>
<p>I did not have a writing experimental and do not recall reading about “boys scouts gossiping about other peers”, but then again, I do not know if I can trust my memory</p>