<p>Lawyer.</p>
<p>The lawyer prepared for future cases by examining previous trials (or something to that effect), while the passage explicitly stated a line about hindsight serving as foresight.</p>
<p>I asked my latin teacher, he said the error is when, because it creates a dangling adverbial clause.</p>
<p>^ End of discussion :)</p>
<p>can someone describe the question and give the other choices for the nuclear passage answer: “pivotal turning point”</p>
<p>can someone also do the same for the ella banks passage where the answer was “marginalized ppl have to participate”</p>
<p>also was the blogging question “to qualify a claim” or “hypothesis”.</p>
<p>finally, was one of the nuclear passage answers “undermine financial cost”?</p>
<p>Nuclear: “allude to a pivotal event”</p>
<p>“Marginalized people have to participate” was correct</p>
<p>Blogging question was “account for a phenomenon.”</p>
<p>That queestion to nuclear passage was to say that green attempts have been “tried but found wanting.”</p>
<p>No, financial understatement was correct.</p>
<p>First time taking the SAT as a Junior, I think i did well on math and writing but reading… omg. What the hell does REBUT mean ?!! It was on the test like 10 times…</p>
<p>rebut: to go against something by evidence, proof, etc. Like to “refute”.</p>
<p>Rebut like a rebuttal!</p>
<p>Can anyone recall the other answer choices or the question that went with “muddy waters” and “apprehensive”? Thanks in advance :D</p>
<p>The answer to the CR question from the nature passage “what what does the author feel is the impact of the movement” is that it was a regrettable development.</p>
<p>Look here:</p>
<p>“As with so many endeavors, nature writing has become specialized and polarized. On the one hand there is the generally healthy movement from the anthropocentric to the biocentric, from human-focused to world-focused, a movement that Thoreau anticipated late in his life with his more scientific writing. This movement has led to some fine objective writing, but it has also led to many dull pages, exhaustive and occasionally exhausting works. The problem is that most readers are human beings and therefore naturally interested in the human. The driving youthful question that enlivened “Walden” – “How to live?” – has been all but forgotten.”</p>
<p>Yes, the passage does say that the movement has produced some “fine objective writing”. But after reading the passage, don’t you get a sense that the author is sad about what has happened to nature writing? He isn’t arguing a pro-con case here, he’s lamenting the loss of an aspect of writing.</p>
<p>If anyone can remember the question word for word, please share it with me, it might change my answer.</p>
<p>
from the anthropocentric to the biocentric
[/quote]
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I’d say that based on hard evidence from the passage, the author is pointing out pros (quote 1) and cons (quote 2) of the ‘movement’, rather than outright lamenting it.</p>
<p>What was the “treatment” or “handling” question, guys?
I was looking on the supposedly consolidated list, and I see:
Treatment = Handling
and below that shaping baker’s life. I thought they were the same question, but I guess not.</p>
<p>okay, so this is the question on Thoreau’s Walden. It has to be scientific. it said in the passage “later focused on his more scientific works.” Walden is even seen as scientific (not long and boring or human centered).</p>
<p>“What Coleridge crucially provided Thoreau with was the encouragement, even perhaps in terms of authorial authority, the right, to merge a scientific approach to nature with his kaleidoscopic imaginative sweep over the living ecology of Walden.”</p>
<p>just look up on google thoreau’s walden scientific & youll see a ton of results.</p>
<p>@Mascara, they’re two different questions, treatment and handing are two of the options.
I think the general consensus was Handling.</p>
<p>@imbrown
I completely agree. We studied Thoreau (Walden specifically) last year in AP Lit, and discussed in great detail his unique, scientific approach to life, humanity, etc… all despite the fact that he was living in a shack in the woods…</p>
<p>It was in the SAT text as well (though pretty deeply buried.)</p>
<p>does anyone know that last four inference questions for the long passage in the 20 minute CR, I think it was the Ella Baker passage? Because I zoned out there and might have made errors there.</p>
<p>Does anybody know if the math experimental was the 20 (I think) question one with the problem that had like the rad a/x problem as #20?</p>
<p>The math section was not as bad as usual. But it still was not my best section. I omitted so many problems DX
All the writing and CR sections were great. I missed like 2 or 3 questions max. </p>
<p>If I don’t get the results I want then i’ll just switch over to the ACT.</p>
<p>SATkilla L2taketheSAT</p>
<p>The experimental is the section that u have double of, for example two 20 minute math sections… do a little research to see which of them was real.</p>
<p>you’re still brown. sucks to suck</p>