Official 4.4 W +, or 2300 + SAT thread but got rejected from Stanford thread

<p>

</p>

<p>Re-read what I said, which was that you attempt to prove that Berkeley is better in some way or another.</p>

<p>Here, it’s somehow that half the students at berkeley are more “fierily” academic than those at Stanford.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Please point to where I said that. (And no, your assertions that Stanford’s admissions policies are “shady” because you know of a few students who you think were “not naturally brilliant, have mediocre grades at best, mediocre scores, no huge extracurriculars, etc who got in.” As you said: “It IS a problem.”)</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Then be precise next time–you seemed to be implying some superiority in one.</p>

<p>I’ve read your posts, and each one has something to do with why Berkeley is better in some way–from being better for choosing classes/planning your schedule, to more “academic” students, and so on.</p>

<p>If this wasn’t your point, then make your purpose clear next time.</p>