<p>I agree with echelon. The answer mentioned the previous men.</p>
<p>i also agree. and it also talked about how she would always get proposed to and then have to leave the house when she said no.</p>
<p>Here is another question for the Crazy Science passage:</p>
<p>The author shows MEASURED RECEPTIVITY to new theories!</p>
<p>echelon = beast</p>
<p>It is measured receptivity correct?? because he certainly wasn’t like venerant of them.</p>
<p>I put measured receptivity.</p>
<p>What were other choices to the measured receptivity Q?</p>
<p>I have a writing question:</p>
<p>Although something something adult palettes, the food was spicy, so she take care not to give it to kids or something like that, what was the problem?</p>
<p>It — I believe it said “Although the dishes _____ adult palettes” or something. So “it” had to change to “them”</p>
<p>right because dishes is plural.</p>
<p>I think it was like </p>
<p>“Because the dishes were spicy she made sure not to give it to the childrem.”</p>
<p>Also for the Dennis one, can we say that the shadow question was awe and not dismay? Because in the choice for dismay was also 'dismay in his presense", so although dismay works and is true, they feel dismay regardless of whether or not he’s there.</p>
<p>What do you guys think a -10 would be, a -11 and a -6/-7</p>
<p>Yes, the correct answer to the science passage is “measured receptivity” because in the intro he claims that he is fascinated by the “new theories” but in the conc he seems to be a little wary. </p>
<p>The other ones were too extreme (something like complete enthusiasm or what ever and outrage).</p>
<p>If I recall correctly, the question asked only what the description (line 18-19 or whatever) implied. Therefore, everything but the author’s description of the boy’s physical features is extraneous to the question.</p>
<p>What are you referring to?</p>
<p>The question in the governess passage that asked what the description of the boy implied</p>
<p>hopefully -12 is a 630 or 640. i think that’s what i got. now math, i hope that -3 is a 740 oh i hope!!!</p>
<p>Ykim, that’s a good explanation for the Shakespeare one. Taking into account the intext support, that’s probably the correct answer, although profitably isn’t really emphasized (he profitably made plays == his plays were good as to attract audience). But I would still say that profitable playmaking is exactly what history knows Shakespeare for, lol. (<– observe my deftness in not ending a sentence with a preposition hehe)</p>
<p>I even have additional support: Passage 1 thinks knowing is doing >_>;;</p>
<p>However, I did consider all that when choosing my answer, and I chose it since royal is never really specified anywhere and because making plays for profit was obviously what Shakespeare did.</p>
<p>anyone remember answers of candor or penetrating… think it may have been on experimental.</p>
<p>yeah i think that was experimental.</p>
<p>is there a compiled answers yet?</p>