<p>eightmagnets yea, exactly why I put something else, but now regretting it.</p>
<p>the flotsam one was easy…</p>
<p>the band flotsam + jetsam</p>
<p>:) plus i knew the definition from a long timeo ago :)</p>
<p>mijehar: yes.</p>
<p>pharmaceutical question…there goes another question that I changed the answer to. </p>
<p>Any other feedback on this question? I really want to know the answer!</p>
<p>mijehar
definitely true</p>
<p>Guys, what other texts did you get in the puerto rican thingy in the same section?</p>
<p>i put his individualty shone through because it clearly stated that he developed his mysterious persona through those sports.</p>
<p>"Does anyone know the answer for the question about the pharmaceutical company testing drugs and how it was more rigorous than industry standards?</p>
<p>Stringent"</p>
<p>yes.</p>
<p>ok. I thought “wild” meant that the waters were crazy, in other words I thought it was being used colloquially. So I was thinking I guess Alaska has got some crazy weather and water or something and I couldn’t find any other word besides “immense” to suggest a similar extremity. I’m most likely wrong, but how did you guys know that “wild” meant like lots of nature and stuff and not like there were crazy rapids and stuff.</p>
<p>Also, I put unfinished because I took suspended very literally, (which would obviously not make sense). </p>
<p>I said it was a foolish imitation because the passage didn’t suggest that the comic book failed to educate. Whereas a foolish imitation was supported by describing educational junk as “embarrassing” and not a very good imitation of junk. That was a really tough question in my opiinion.</p>
<p>hmmm, let me think about ill-conceived failure and foolish imitation.</p>
<p>conceived - To form or develop in the mind; devise.</p>
<p>so im guessing ill-conceived means horribly formed or devised? that would mean badly designed failures.</p>
<p>foolish - stupid, embarrassed
imitation - copy</p>
<p>foolish imitation would mean a stupid copy or an embarrassing copy.</p>
<p>so i think its foolish imitation although i put ill-conceived failure.</p>
<p>someone plz prove me wrong since i dont wanan get it wrong!</p>
<p>dam it!</p>
<p>the comic book was imitation not ill concieved</p>
<p>it was a bad imitation of “real” educational material…it was not ill concieved…or w.e. that choice was…there was nothing ill natured about it mentioned it was just ridiculous and a bad imitation of true learning…thats how i see it</p>
<p>well… “ill conceived failures” doesnt even go with the light hearted tone of the essay</p>
<p>Lewis was sometimes didactic, right?</p>
<p>crapcrapcrapcrapcrapcrapcrapcrap</p>
<p>I think this is -3 now.</p>
<p>jORJE
i think it was venus thing wasn’t it?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Agreed…</p>
<p>was the cr passage about groups experimental?
even if it was, does anyone know the answer to what “this” referred to–I put that it is difficult to hold an opinion that the groupd doesn’t hold…but was it that a discovery that groups change peoples opinions?</p>
<p>"ok. I thought “wild” meant that the waters were crazy, in other words I thought it was being used colloquially. So I was thinking I guess Alaska has got some crazy weather and water or something and I couldn’t find any other word besides “immense” to suggest a similar extremity. I’m most likely wrong, but how did you guys know that “wild” meant like lots of nature and stuff and not like there were crazy rapids and stuff.</p>
<p>Also, I put unfinished because I took suspended very literally, (which would obviously not make sense). </p>
<p>I said it was a foolish imitation because the passage didn’t suggest that the comic book failed to educate. Whereas a foolish imitation was supported by describing educational junk as “embarrassing” and not a very good imitation of junk. That was a really tough question in my opiinion."</p>
<p>wild was meant in the sense that i was innocent from mans development
it was like…the wilderness</p>
<p>suspended was correct.</p>
<p>i put foolish whatever, but tahts just me.</p>
<p>I do not think it was dry humor because his statement was not particularly ironic or humorous.</p>
<p>Lewis was sometimes didactic, yes.</p>
<p>I also put foolish imitation, for the record.</p>