<p>**characterization of spice trade- ironic vs. dramatic **
professor- pompous and stuffy
photographs take away from the novelty
question repeated w/ the pakistani people- growing indignant feeling
peremptory/ordeal
circumvent
assiduous
proper is closest to correct
snide
flop
easygoing
neophyte articulate and mocking position vs predict reaction and respond
tennis spectators- close attention
primacy
disconcerted for the guy who had to extemporize fundamentally vs solely
peremptory/ideal method or whatever used in writing- analogous reasoning vs. repetition
grandma was being adamant when she stood in place
grandma was being a bully in the other one
sphinx’s gaze holds
similar thing in both passages- faculty’s role vs coursework can lead to good civil character
assertion followed my comical anecdote
idealistic
realistic evocative for sphinx
hard to believe
familiar
author 2 asking a q by author 1
library sensory details
ephemereal but powerful
first paragraph provided context
confounded/inscrutable
she left resentfully acknowledged
conflicts
adjust the power instead of using maximum power
reflective but informative
he bought a book electronically while sitting in a library systematically discredits vs 2 presents view 1 finds objectionable
eludes classification
defining a quality
adequate pinpoint
shortcomings</p>
<p>45/67 questions</p>
<p>BOLDING represents controversy over the question</p>
<p>@swoony, systematically discredits and 2 presents a view 1 finds objectionable , were the only two viable choices… I eliminated down to those two and picked systematically discredits</p>
<p>Also, the other q was for analogous reasoning vs. repetition… I’m fairly certain the answer was repetition</p>
<p>@krungle yeah it’s responds. A friend of mine compiled most of this list so i’ll have to change that accordingly. @gt i think you’re confusing some answers (regarding your first post). regarding your second post, I don’t remember what I put so if anyone has other answer choices please post them here…
and for analagous reasoning vs. repetition…I think i put something else but i’m not sure so i’d have to look at the other answer choices.</p>
<p>I still think it is systematically discredits. Because the author discredit’s the other author’s argument by saying that he/she does not consider the whole picture.</p>
<p>Yep, repetition is correct for sure, as is dramatic. Fundamentally seems obviously correct, and the sphinx was evocative for sure. I also believe that “predict and respond to a reaction” and “espouses a view that the writer of author 1 finds objectionable” are correct answers, but with these I can see how one could argue the other side.</p>
<p>I don’t remember my answer but the latter one in my list is (I think) wrong. Author 1 would not find viewpoint 2 objectionable because it did NOT contradict author 1’s argument. Rather, it built on author 1’s argument by mentioning that author 1’s argument was too limited in scope and though author one was correct about formal coursework/teachers not being able to influence moral character, the college as a whole is able to.</p>
<p>In short, I think systematically discredits or whatever is right.</p>
<p>for the question about the Khyber pass in the passage about adventure and being lost i was deciding between “an exotic locale” and “a pleasant place to be lost” i think i ended up picking the former what was it?</p>