<p>ditto on the human circulatory as well</p>
<p>what was the answer about history and literature in the encyclopedias passage</p>
<p>God tell me I didn’t **** up the previous problem too, **** **** ****!!!</p>
<p>ok its not bogus it is extremely viable</p>
<p>history and literature was “narrow and biased”</p>
<p>yea i got narrowed and biased as well</p>
<p>ya cause it only had to do with “western imperialism”</p>
<p>what was the answer about the future generations for encyclopedia question</p>
<p>narrow and biased</p>
<p>“what u all put for the sentence that should be deleted from the writing paragraph correction”</p>
<p>Sentence 5.</p>
<p>people in each genenration do what ?</p>
<p>i put have wrong belief of extent knowledge.
it was either that or less and less wanting to learn the past.</p>
<p>that was kind of hard</p>
<p>I might have put sentence 8 but i am not sure</p>
<p>they think thier science is really good but its not really cause it will always get better in the future</p>
<p>Was it “overestimate the breadth of their knowledge?”</p>
<p>second the narrow and biased. Does anyone remember any squid passage questions? I was convinced it was experimental (25min/25 q’s thing) and I think I messed on some of them…</p>
<p>I also put down something like “overestimated their knowledge” for Nabokov’s quote, although I also debated putting down the “contemptuous of any definit knowledge”. It seemed a bit extreme.</p>
<p>I think i put like they will replace it or something like that.</p>
<p>There Was Nothing That Would Suggest That Didn’t Want To Learn About The Past They Only Mention That They Think “our” Science Is Not Deep While That Would Mean They Think Thiers Is Deep Which Is Not True Because Look At What Happened To Us, Our Was Not As Deep As We Thought</p>
<p>Squid compared to dragon, was legends?</p>
<p>yeh i put overestimate because A seemed right at first, but it said “less and less” which cannot be proven from the passage plus</p>