<p>I got (A)none for the integral</p>
<p>anybody?</p>
<p>MUTHA, i misread it then</p>
<p>the answer was none</p>
<p>good. heh, i went thru the hassle of going thru the entire table-set on my calculator to find that it was none.</p>
<p>anyone an explanation for the cone problem?</p>
<p>“How about the question asking how many integrals (??) between (0,0) and (78,83)?”</p>
<p>None, I believe. 78 and 83 are relatively prime, and that’s why, right? I plugged the eqn into the calc and tried out table values up to about 53. Then I stopped since it seemed apparent there were none.</p>
<p>the line would be y = 83x/73. there are no integers in the interval (0, 73) that satisfy 83x/73 are in the set of all integers.</p>
<p>For the record it was (73, 83), not (78, 83), and I too went through the whole silly table :)</p>
<p>Oh and here’s an answer that I dont think has been brought up:
7.78% increase?</p>
<p>what about that question where u have an angle theta in quadrant3 and a point (-2,-3) and it asked about sin(theta</p>
<p>put it in polar form. you get -2.somthing, then just subtract 2pi and you get it.</p>
<p>-3/sqrt13?</p>
<p>edit - simplified version of that</p>
<p>i got -3/rad 13 for that problem</p>
<p>desidude: yes</p>
<p>yes, the choice was -.83</p>
<p>According to the Ti-89, the answer was -3/sqrt13 (well, the calc rationalized the denominator, but still).</p>
<p>i thought it was the lower 7% increase</p>
<p>the one with the (x,.08) (1.0) on the circle?</p>
<p>was it .93 or .64?</p>
<p>107% increase for NYC</p>
<p>it was .93 i believe</p>
<p>it was the lower 7 % increaes. not 107, nor the higher one.</p>
<p>desidude, i put .93 because its the only one longer than the value that i got for the actual distance between the points.</p>
<p>For the NYC problem, which is what I was talking about before it seems, I got 7.78% and there was another choice 7.5% i believe. You put 7.5%?</p>