<p>chattering guests, lovely cake, and great music-- chattering is an adjective in this case (look it up online). Its characteristic. you can tell because it uses “have” to suggest plurality and therefore characterstic should be –> Characteristics (with s)</p>
<p>I thought “characteristic of” is like an expression - Such behavior is very characteristic of her. Hmm.</p>
<p>Yeah, isn’t characteristic an adjective?</p>
<p>its kinda ambiguous, but look online dictionary. it has it both ways. in that sentence though, that was the only potential error</p>
<p>chattering takes the role of an adjective by the use of a gerund. Any verb + ing can be used as an adjective (or was it a noun?) Whatever. Characteric is probably the error =p</p>
<p>What’s the searching eyes question? I was stuck between penetrating and beseeching.</p>
<p>penetrating, beseeching is to beg</p>
<p>for the one about the cheetah’s and hierarchy, i thought it was the one about cheetahs having difficulty getting food BECAUSE they were in a somewhat controlled environment, much unlike their normal environment where they can get food and survive, not because of the fierce competition of carnivores. then again, i don’t remember the question exactly so i could be wrong</p>
<p>searching is penetrating</p>
<p>Yea its up for grabs. I believe it was the cheetah specific one because it says “Grim Hierarchy”. Grim pertains only to the perspective of Cheetahs. For example, its definitely not grim for Lions (eating Cheetah cubs) or Vultures, Hyenas (chasing cheetahs away -_-’ … dont ask me how a bird chases away a cheetah though).So i chose it was hard for cheetah to get food, making them at the very bottom of the “hierarchy”. Hence it’s “grim” for them. </p>
<p>However, some people are citing the example that Lions eating Cheetah young does not neccessarily pertain to cheetah catching prey… but then again its one sentence and does not deal with cheetahs specifically</p>
<p>yeah i put the same nightflarer because it went on to mention about how the steal it’s prey or whatever.</p>
<p>anyone remember that one that had the people studying music and art? I got 16 for that, 48 students, 9 study neither, 30 study music, 25 study art, 48-9-39; 55-39=16 that study both?</p>
<p>that’s exactly correct simranchawa…i remember we did one or two of those in stats…lol</p>
<p>im glad to hear about the penetrating thing because i got it right.
and also the characteristics one. :)</p>
<p>did everyone get the ‘study of insects’ thing? i guessed the one that starts with ‘e’ and i got it right, according to my teacher.</p>
<p>i took a random guess- chose the one that started with e … one of the hardest sc’s ive seen… and it was #3!!!</p>
<p>characteristic is not wrong…</p>
<p>characteristic is being used as an adjective correctly and not a noun, if it was a noun THEN it would be wrong</p>
<p>besides a verb + a gerund = a noun also not an adjective</p>
<p>yeah i wasnt too sure</p>
<p>the good news for me is if i can break 1900, i will have the highest score in my school, that says a lot…</p>
<p>What was the plant one that was no error? someone tell me plz</p>
<p>Perhaps today was a bad day…This morning I woke up at six with a dream that I missed the SAT test. Then I went to the actual SAT and my watch broke so I had to look at the clock constantly. I was seated in the front and I hate the front. I have red eye. My proctor was my friend’s brother, how distracting. My best friend was in the same room I was and was bothersome because we always compete and I know she does better than me.</p>
<p>Sigh.</p>
<p>I hope I did well on the test. I omitted at least like 5-8 questions on each math section (because I’m horrible at math). And I hope my writing was too terrible because I overthought it after reading some grammar book last night.</p>
<p>Damned.</p>
<p>Critical reading was probably my best, I think.</p>
<p>Someone save me for the October/December SAT. Good thing I have all summer to prep for it. Oh no! SAT IIs in November.</p>
<p>So I’m going to be a Senior soon and the year is suppose to be lax is it?</p>
<p>It doesn’t look like it so far.</p>
<p>Campaigns, college apps, sigh, die, blagh.</p>
<p>i to do not think that “characterisitcs of” makes any sense… the party was characteristic of… not characteristics of…</p>
<p>The three adjectives used to describe the nouns were: chattering, tiered, and lively. Only chattering is underlined o_O. </p>
<p>Maybe it’s no error?</p>