<p>apparentley, mastodons. but i specifically checked and the second passage only mentioned that mastodons didn’t survive an ice age, and that they hunted for sea mammals and stuff (not really “game” IMO)</p>
<p>okay so I’m have no idea what the experimental section was
I got 4 reading sections…2 immediately in the beginning…
I know that one of them was the yawning one…but I can’t rememebr whether it came first or second…
casue I remmeber me being more confident on the ist one…</p>
<p>so anyone with reading experimental…so u know if the yawning one was the first or the second experimental</p>
<p>i put that they acknowledged the fact it was hard to to travel in the glaciers
and in an another one which asked what evidence would help the second author
i put like boats found about 15000yrs ago</p>
<p>For the yawning passage, I saw some people discussing a question about the overall tone of the passage? I have no memory of this; can anyone recall the question more exactly? Hopefully I didnt skip a question and mess up my entire CR test, because I think I did better than last time…</p>
<p>I also got two reading to begin with… and I put boat anchors would substantiate the argument.</p>
<p>crude anchors found 15,000, is that what you meant?</p>
<p>do you mean anchors from 15000 years ago? All I know is I put one with anchors that was more than 13500 years or whatever it was</p>
<p>boats anchors found 15000 years ago was the answer. It proves that boats were used and provides and alternate explanation for that 14,500 year old arrowhead</p>
<p>therhymegirl, I got 2 reading sections from the start as well.</p>
<p>sibsagar12, I put the 15000 years ago thing too.</p>
<p>yep elliot</p>
<p>was one of the choices humor? because i changed it at the end and i didn’t want to but i felt like it =(</p>
<p>my order was:
- essay
- CR
- CR
- Math
- Writing
- CR = one with workers/factories + ice age migration…
- Math
- CR = library/little women
- Math
- Writing…</p>
<p>I REALLY HOPE my section 6 one is experimental…cuz i really f’d that up…lol…</p>
<p>yeah did anyone remember putting anecdote for that small story regarding the plane and pilots</p>
<p>Was it a “humorous aside” for that lengthy description of yawning? I didnt think that was defining yawning, I’m pretty sure everyone knew what yawning meant.</p>
<p>no i put it was defining what yawning meant</p>
<p>I thought it was indeed defining, i didn’t find it humorous, only boring</p>
<p>sibs: I remember putting anecdote for something, don’t remember what though</p>
<p>on your thing either section 2 or 3 was experimental. i had the same format.</p>
<p>the question where the answer was anecdote was different from the yawning interjection thing. I put down defining a term.</p>
<p>So…was the section on factories/workers + ice age…an experimental? thanks</p>
<p>do u remember putting anecdote for a questions . other choices was understatement, methaphor and others</p>
<p>I also had the factories/ice age, not sure if it is experimental or not</p>
<p>sibs: considering the other choices you gave, it was definitely anecdote</p>