<p>good.</p>
<p>I think it’s the ongoing relationship one.</p>
<p>ongoing relationship this one and the mouth/profile one are ambiguous</p>
<p>In the blurb at the beginning, it said “this passage is written by blah…about the relationship of black americans to africans”…it seems logical that it would be ongoing relationship</p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with the mouth/profile question.,.</p>
<p>I don’t see how it could be nations…</p>
<p>The relationship makes more sense.</p>
<p>Add to the list (or edit the list) of correct answers:</p>
<p>Walden comparison passages
–Author would say that isn’t how teachers use the text
–Behaviour was atypical for Thoreau
–Passage 1 Author would say train ruined nature’s tranquility</p>
<p>Africa and America
–Broad generalizations
–Cultural ties between two nations
–Unsubstantiated for the shadows question.
–Doubt to pride</p>
<p>Ada King
–Purpose was to examine Ada King’s popularity, etc.
–Author would disagree that Ada’s parent had nothing to do with her fame.</p>
<p>Mona Lisa
–Author of Passage 1 would add “mouth”
–Leo’s quote was to characterize a technique
–“innate” to express doubt in a theory
–Passage 1 is to explain art technique, 2 examines its popularity
–The passage about the real Mona woman shows humble –> important</p>
<p>City and Ecosystems
–Cliff talk = Appreciation for city ecosystem
–Tree/Building comparison = city must be self regulating to survive(?)
–Dams and anthills are like buildings = it is natural instinct
–3 pieces of evidence = arguments to support fundamental claim</p>
<p>Ms. Keeplar
–“Romantic” means unconventional outlook
–Hands to the heavens –> Bleak future
–Won’t marry guy because of his RECKLESS behaviour
–Response to celibacy question = refusal to answer
–Uncle and Girl have IRRECOLANCIABLE differences
–Uncle and Girl agree = She shouldn’t marry an undignified man</p>
<p>keep adding!</p>
<p>i agree with yankees</p>
<p>What were the other choices for the Africa Broad generalizations question?</p>
<p>“Tree/Building comparison = city must be self regulating to survive(?)”</p>
<p>i put something else…what were other answers?</p>
<p>To add to that list, I thought there was one on the Mona Lisa one about being three-dimensional, although I can’t recall the wording of the question exactly.</p>
<p>Ms. Keeplar – she answers his question as “regarding future plans” or something like that.</p>
<p>not self regulating., </p>
<p>something about natural laws limit us i think.</p>
<p>jegan I think it was “what would both authors agree with about the Mona Lisa?” I put that it creates idiosyncratic responses in its viewers. Is that right?</p>
<p>er for the mona lisa origins question… wasnt that E? moderate social status to aesthetic value?</p>
<p>Yep daiikon, natural laws.</p>
<p>virtuoso – the literal definition of nations means it makes sense in context, although really I’m not sure if it was the “best” answer choice.</p>
<p>Cliff talk = Appreciation for city ecosystem</p>
<p>for this I put that he was (don’t remember the word, but indifferent) In the passage is was something like “to us it merely represents a change from a forest ecosystem to a cliffside ecosystem”…it just doesn’t seem appreciative, more neutral…anybody have an opinion?</p>
<p>sum, you’re correct with moderate social staturs and aesthetic value</p>
<p>oh and virtuoso – i put three dimensional, although i agonized over it for a while. I eventually realized that the lines in passage 2 they were asking about was actually a direct quote from Paul somebody talking specifically about three dimensional technique.</p>
<p>i second avant-garde’s comment, I think it was moderate social status</p>
<p>I dont agree with refusal to answer on last passage. IT seems to me that it was she challenged or w/e. Wait was this the answer?
Also on teacher disagreeemtn passage. Wasn’t the first one of making nature destructive or something. I forget answer choices. Can someone post the answer choices?</p>