<p>It was definitely bully . . . cajole is close, but doesn’t work.</p>
<p>okay for the logic question… where the choices were penchant/evading, bent/analyzing
wouldn’t it make sense that if she had an inclination towards logic, she is likely to EVADE argumentative problems?
I agree, MLK VERY DIFFICULT/CONFUSING
Acting section not too bad.
Cecil wasn’t as terrible either,
those were the non experimental ones
my experimental was crit reading about Nixon</p>
<p>Simplistic
Completely agreed
Laying foundations
Appreciates political concern? <- I don’t remember what this was
Vain
bully</p>
<p>if she had a penchant for logic, why would she try and escape the discussion? i think you’re looking too deep into it…</p>
<p>ca·jole
tr.v. ca·joled, ca·jol·ing, ca·joles</p>
<pre><code>To urge with gentle and repeated appeals, teasing, or flattery; wheedle.
</code></pre>
<p>The answer is definitely bully, since it talked about threatening.</p>
<p>also did anyone get nudge as one of the SC answers?</p>
<p>bully not nudge or cajole</p>
<p>No, it was not nudge . . . it was “bully”</p>
<p>well if she were logical, she wouldn’t get into those kinds of problems/arguments… it makes sense to me</p>
<p>anyone get the cecil one about her quiet life but she played piano? I put something about her becoming passionate about life</p>
<p>Ok, someone answer my question . . . for the acting passage, do you remember when it asked, “this paragraph assumes that actors have…” i put “already experience all human emotions” but i want to know what others put</p>
<p>-have already experience all human emotions (yes i said taht too)
-simplistic
-cautious optimism
-laying foundations
-vain
-bully
-bent/analyzing
-honeychurch will become passionate about life</p>
<p>i put have experienced all human emotions. but i only remember that section vaguely; it was a hard one.</p>
<p>yeah, i put passionate about life as well</p>
<p>if she were logical, wouldnt she solve the problems to make the other people see where their logic was flawed?</p>
<p>and i dont see how it was laying a foundation. he suggested that the lawthing be used for spam, but would that really be considered laying a foundation? i put analyzing a problem or whatever.</p>
<p>the acting one was crap hard, did anyone get the prehistoric human CR passage? was it experimental?</p>
<p>PLEASE</p>
<p>The one with the community college and university and 35 and 3 or whatever. Anyone get 47? That one confused/stumped me for some reason.</p>
<p>Also, the one with -f(x) = f(-x) when…was the answer x^2+x? Or x^2+4? Anyone??</p>
<p>it’s laying a foundation for political change because he says if that law about the phones was extended to cover spam on email the problem would be solved</p>
<p>i put laying a foundation, because he was describing an outline of a solution</p>
<p>I put completely agree but i too questioned it because it was too extreme. In the end, i chose it because it made more sense than optimistic…
There was nothing in the statement to be optimistic about–perhaps the fact that someone shares her point of view. But in that case, I thought that she would be in agreement anyway.</p>