<p>Rrrradiohead! :)</p>
<p>LOVE RADIOHEAD.</p>
<p>…</p>
<p>Ahem. =D</p>
<p>^ Look at that, you both have exactly the same post count!</p>
<p>^ Yours is a palindrome!</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>Well, depending on how much I speed…</p>
<p>I love how CC practically goes dead at about 10 central when, I presume, the entire east coast goes to bed…</p>
<p>aha. not me 
I’m personally not going entirely crazy in the waiting game, like I was during the early round. I’ll probably go to starbucks with a bunch of people after school and then come home and check.</p>
<p>zz </p>
<p>any thoughts on the stimulus bill, boys and girls?
t’is not perfect, but what is? hundreds of billions in solely tax cuts? surely not</p>
<p>Ha, I’m usually in bed by 10 mountain time. Although recently I’ve bene staying up 'till 11 or so. Apparently teenage brains are built to stay up late?</p>
<p>The stimulus…Oh boy, where to begin. I’m still holding out hope that it won’t pass.</p>
<p>No, Butternut, the “Spendulus” passed the Senate earlier. Now they have that conference committee, and, in “conferencing,” they’ll probably raise the pricetag even higher!</p>
<p>what do you think stimulus is? tax cuts and reagonomics? laff.</p>
<p>stimulus IS spending… ask paul krugman when you get into princeton… haha… hahahahahaha</p>
<p>The stimulus is a joke, in all honesty.</p>
<p>Massive spending really didn’t work before, and I don’t see how it’s going to work now. </p>
<p>Hopefully his next efforts at rejuvenating the economy will be more innovative, since that’s what we’re looking for with him.</p>
<p>massive spending always works, end of story.</p>
<p>and what do you mean, it didn’t work before?</p>
<p>more innovative? how else can you “rejuvenate” an economy?</p>
<p>anyone know the exact day decisions come out? and if online or by mail?</p>
<p>vouch @ Procrastination</p>
<p>“The stimulus is a joke, in all honesty.” In what respects? Hm?</p>
<p>“Massive spending really didn’t work before” When? Specifics could help to strengthen your point.</p>
<p>“the “Spendulus” passed the Senate earlier” What do you think ‘stimulus’ is?</p>
<p>“Oh boy, where to begin. I’m still holding out hope that it won’t pass.” Please, begin… I’d like to hear your concerns and reasons for why it will not pass…</p>
<p>“they’ll probably raise the pricetag even higher!” Good. Right now, putting out 800+billion isn’t enough. Simply speaking, we’re going to need over 1 trillion dollars to build a bridge across this economic “chasm,” if you will. If we only build the bridge halfway (800+bill) we still fall deep into the abyss of our current recession. (Taken from Princeton’s own, Paul Krugman - who you conservatives should watch before you take a step onto Princeton’s campus so as not to embarrass yourselves.) I’ll even help you boys, and girls, out –> [Morning</a> Joe](<a href=“http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/vp/29051511#29051511]Morning”>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/vp/29051511#29051511) Start @ 4:30 …</p>
<p>lol we use krugman’s book for micro, hope i get a chance to take classes from him (if he does teach undergrad courses at princeton?)</p>
<p>no wonder CC is dead when i come on at 12 am PST. Forgot about the time differences…lol I always thought I checked CC too often for my own good to see new posts come up around that time…</p>
<p>heh me too - idk if he does or not</p>
<p>For the record, I realize that something must be done about our current economic situation. If that means racking up a debt for generations to come, if it must be done, it must be done. However, I am not at all for the way that the administration has gone about this. They have proposed a plan with a total lack of transparency. We know that it’s our money, we know they’re spending it, but that’s about it (an exaggeration somewhat, but the plan is greatly lacking in transparency). Am I the only one who is concerned with these issues? No, I think not. Just after Geithner spoke today, the Dow headed down and stayed there, closing down 385 points. Apparently, investors are concerned too; perhaps they don’t like the idea of bailing out poor performance and financial incompetence with a trillion taxpayer dollars.</p>
<p>umm what? lol. Do you know why the DOW headed down? it’s not because of the stimulus bill buddy… lol… its because Geithner’s speech lacked clear step-by-step specifics on how to use the projected 2trilliion dollars (and 350$billion from TARP pt2) to help bailout the US financial system. Why did it lack the specifics? bc govt is still drawing up the plan to begin with. Expect another speech, after the end of the drawing up of this plan, to be followed by an upday in the markets.</p>