<p>in a past discussion everyone was glossing over one question. Everyone seemed to get the answer of inadvertantly and accidental for a sc. I had this answer but changed it because the sentence said that the sister contradicted him so the words need to be opposites… did anyone else get this</p>
<p>By the way, the October math section is taken from two sources (one from 2002 March, one from 2003 November), depending on which version you get; the math is pretty EASY this time; i pretty sure the top math curve will be (I’m at least 90% confident):</p>
<p>did everyone have a question about how many 3 digit numbers 3 adn 4 can make if you use both at least once? or was that question an exprimental question?</p>
<p>"If you took the SAT Reasoning Test on Saturday, October 9, 2004, you had one of two section orders. Your test was organized like this:</p>
<p>math (regular 5-choice questions)
verbal (long reading passage)
equating (the one that doesn’t count toward your score)
math (QC and SPR questions)
verbal (2 reading passages)
math (regular 5-choice questions)
verbal (long reading passage)
OR, like this:</p>
<p>verbal (long reading passage)
math (regular 5-choice questions)
math (QC and SPR questions)
verbal (2 reading passages)
equating (the one that doesn’t count toward your score)
verbal (long reading passage)
math (regular 5-choice questions)"</p>
<p>What was the answer to the question in the first section I believe, that asked for the area of the rectangle and they gave you coordinates. I think I might have screwed that one up.</p>
<p>wait i’m confused, wouldn’ tthe answer be 8 for this question:</p>
<p>“did everyone have a question about how many 3 digit numbers 3 adn 4 can make if you use both at least once? or was that question an exprimental question”</p>
<p>because u can use 3 or 4 a total of 3 times???</p>
<p>No. Because the question was phrased something like this: "How many distinct three digit numbers can you make with 3 and 4, if you HAVE TO use each number at least once, and something else about the positioning of the numbers or something.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember a fill in the blank that asked "Scientists believe that when the universe began its expansion _____ the speed of light, thus____ the notion that it was possible to travel faster than the speed of light. I put surpassed and spawning, but I remember a few people saying that exceed and belie was the answer. However belie does not make sense in this context because belie means to be in contradiction with. However I may have misread the question.</p>
<p>If I misread that scentence and that possible was impossible I am going to be ****ed, for I will have made yet another stupid mistake that has kept me from 800 V.</p>