<p>the grizzly bear one did have an error!
it was b, who should be that!</p>
<p>the manuscript was a rare find, even though it was difficult to decipher and had begun to distegrate. was what many people (including me lol) considered to be no error.</p>
<p>hey just out of curiosity did anyone ues the TI-89 or TI-89 Titanium on the test???</p>
<p>and did your proctor allow you to use them and also did they make you clear your memory???</p>
<p>I thought it was parallelism and should have been began.</p>
<p>i used ti 89, proctor said it was allowed. (Praise the Lord for numeric solver!)</p>
<p>what was the answer to the writing question where it said something about the strait is half as big as tennesee or something like that?</p>
<p>The honor roll math question was saying if all the kids in each grade got same percent of honorall as the one grade give. So it was 30/150 which gave you .2. So .2 x all the other ones gave you 125 total. I did this problem twice, and I know 125 is correct.</p>
<p>Also the triangle is 18. It was triangle ADH, so it is side length 6 (AD) multiplied by the altitude, which in this case was just side length, so 6 x 6 is 36, divide by 2 to get answer of 18.</p>
<p>Oh, and tiles was undoubtly 200.</p>
<p>btw, further proof proving triangle is 18.</p>
<p>Side length = 6</p>
<p>AD is 6</p>
<p>H is midpoint BC, BC is opposite AD</p>
<p>Altitude triangle ADH is thus 6. (Opposite to opposite)</p>
<p>(6^2)/2 = 18</p>
<p>for the manuscript problem I said it was no error…but I may have been wrong</p>
<p>I probably was wrong, 1 no error probably wasn’t enough.</p>
<p>what was the answer to the writing question where it said something about the strait is half as big as tennesee or something like that? it was the first question of the paragraph section</p>
<p>All I can remember is that the original sentence (I think it was a fragment) was not correct.</p>
<p>what were the answers for that question…i cant remember</p>
<p>I must got full score on math and 50% on CR, 70% on writing</p>
<p>im also wondering. wat were the 2 no error questions? i know i had 2 no errors, but i only remember the grisly one. what was the other one?</p>
<p>and coolblue, “that” cannot modify “scientists”, you have to use “who”</p>
<p>also the manuscript one did have an error – “had begun”</p>
<p>I thought that was an error too, but I’m not completely sure. Sometimes past perfect fits in…any grammar experts here?</p>
<p>I think had begun is right. The manuscripts were already decaying when the scientists found it. That was a no error question.</p>
<p>the CR was so hard. same with the writing. but the math was so easy!
its kind of hard to do the CR when your eng teacher doesn’t “like” vocab so the class doesn’t learn it. I’m pretty sure i bombed the CR and writing.
Thank God I’m a sophomore!</p>
<p>il bandito that logic makes sense. Thanks.</p>
<p>but wouldnt the verbs, “was” and “had begun” have to agree?</p>
<p>why is the gizzly bear (sp?) no error? I put “more than” because I thot it was comparing the bear with the rest of the wild animal… so it should be “most”. :(:(:(</p>