<p>I agree with westofguam. It was like a monster or something question</p>
<p>Did you guys say the Inhabitant conservation for the bat paragraph was kept or deleted. I put kept because it relates to the scope of the passage or something</p>
<p>me too^ hopefully it correct.</p>
<p>Nope. Bat part needed to be deleted.</p>
<p>I was confused on that one too, but it was kept, because it said that the bat conservation was relatively irrelevant (barely relevant) to his life, which is wrong (he established the group… so…)</p>
<p>I put “Who really is the monster?” as well.</p>
<p>The bat conservationist group need to be kept. it shows his accomplishments or something like that.</p>
<p>What was the answer to that question in the Frankenstein passage that had the underlined part as “Then I read it.” How were you supposed to make that “personal”?</p>
<p>Didn’t it talk about how the monster was created and then left alone… What was the monster thinking made more sense to me</p>
<p>Phillies, that was said to portray the scientist as an emotionless ****** who created life and neglected it – a monster.</p>
<p>26antara, I think I chose the one where she saw the book in a library because that is a more personal experience than all the others were. It wasn’t that a friend recommended it to her.</p>
<p>I said library. It was how it showed his opinions were personal. Friend recommending it and reading a review it does not make it seems as if it were his/her opinions being iterated. But I’m not sure if I should’ve just left it as the original “Then I read it.”</p>
<p>@LookingUp8 - Agreed.</p>
<p>@26antara - I was wondering the same thing. I think I ended up selecting no change… if I remember correctly, none of the other options even seemed like remote possibilities. Probably got that one wrong.</p>
<p>LookingUp, Thanks, I wasn’t sure on that question. I left it as it was since I had no clue.</p>
<p>I got “Who really is the monster?” because it said something about how he waned to create it then instantly abandon it. Which implies that Frankenstein had a purpose for creating someone that had died. Why would he want to create something like that and then abandon it? It meant that the person he tried to create had some significance to him.</p>
<p>26antara I left it as “Then I read it” because it showed how the narrators personal experience changed his line of thought.</p>
<p>For the “then I read it” one I put no change because it is the only one that was about personally discovering the book- the other options were about reviews he read and his friends influencing him</p>
<p>It’s “Then I read it.” 100%</p>
<p>I still think it was that she saw it in the library… that was the most personal to her.</p>
<p>@Nspire- Exactly! I had no idea what they meant by personal. I feel that’s too vague and too relative of a term.</p>
<p>^agree with sillyup</p>
<p>“Then I read it.” makes the most sense simply because it explains how her opinion changed from from her preconceptions to when she actually read it</p>
<p>the answer was no change I believe</p>