<p>megan702 what proabability problem? can u describe it?</p>
<p>i think the cr curve will be harsh. the jan 2013 curve was -1-790 and i felt like this test was very similar in difficulty to the jan 2013 one.</p>
<p>GUYS. Let’s establish a rating system for how hard we think each sections difficulty was.</p>
<p>Math
Easy:
Average: 1
Hard:</p>
<p>CR
Easy:
Average:
Hard: 1</p>
<p>Writing
Easy:
Average: 1
Hard: </p>
<p>Vote yourself just by adding 1 to the count for each category. Hopefully we can see what we thought and maybe have a vague prediction of the curve? GO VOTE!</p>
<p>Aetherskly - i dont know honestly cuz alot of people were debating about 2 answer choices for several questions on CR</p>
<p>like the probability to use one type of worker was 1/26 and the probability to choose another kind was 1/33 (i can’t remember exact numbers) But what was the probability of choosing neither if we assume none of them were both?</p>
<p>1- (1/26) - (1/33) to get the prob for choosing neither worker</p>
<p>math-average
writing-average
reading-hard</p>
<p>I don’t remember the exact answer, but you took the total number of workers and multiplied by (1/26) and then added that to the total number of workers multiplied by (1/33). Then you subtracted that sum from the total number of workers.</p>
<p>EDIT:</p>
<p>math – normal (made stupid mistakes that I’ll regret when sending my scores in) – expecting 640 (worst case scenario)
reading – easy – expecting 730 (worst case scenario)
writing – easy – expecting 720 (worst case scenario)</p>
<p>Using the average of previous SAT curves, I’ll probably be around a 2150.</p>
<p>I think it was 126 but I don’t really remember. I know I got that one right though.</p>
<p>that’s what i did. did you get 162??? pleaseee i already got like 2 wrong! ahhh i wanna cancel.</p>
<p>math-average
writing-average
cr-easy</p>
<p>yea it was 162</p>
<p>Was the answer derisive?? i put openly differential 
it’s almost the same i think</p>
<p>i put derisive @productrule</p>
<p>I really hope so @Tidumattud!</p>
<p>i put derisive. pretty sure it was mocking</p>
<p>@megan</p>
<p>The answer was 162. It was 34/34 -6/34 -1/34 which is 27/34 then you set up an equality and solve for 27/34 = x/208 which gives you 162. Those aren’t the exact numbers but they are damn close. The answer was definitely 162.</p>
<p>Um no they said the diameter of the smaller circle was 6, so its radius is 3. They also said that the radius of the bigger circle was 5 more than that of the smaller circle, so therefore 64/9.</p>
<p>kaushikdr, are people really still talking about that question?</p>
<p>I put openly defential because the Luddites were very radical as shown by the subscript.</p>
<p>ya general consensus of 64/9</p>