<p>@Harrovian that’s what I thought. From what I recall you needed to put the lodge after the introductory phrase because the introductory phrase described (adjectively modified) the lodge and not it’s rental costs (I think that’s what it was relating).</p>
<p>The one about pine tree needles, what was that again?</p>
<p>the first grid in question, were the two angles vertical angles?</p>
<p>@choolio and triste-
I got satire</p>
<p>skier that was the section I had quite a bit of time on after I was done and double checked everything. I’m pretty confident, but of course none of us have the damn test in front of us.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember their answer to the math question where there were 540 people and you had to find the number of people that were 2 and older? I got 180</p>
<p>Okay I may (more than likely) sound dumb but for the question where there were 8 numbers in a sequence and it went 2,4,. . ., n what was the answer? I didn’t understand which number they were asking for.</p>
<p>@Joesm112 The last one.</p>
<p>I had the first three but not the last one and I had experimental math</p>
<h1>14 on section 10, the writing question? What did you guys get?</h1>
<p>can someone please tell me the answer
to the serene river question.</p>
<p>And please tell me it was no error.
People are telling me different things.</p>
<p>Individualism and the experiments on groups was the experimental.</p>
<p>@woodjew
I got 90 srry</p>
<p>it wouldn’t be satire its hypothetical reasoning. she is thinking about what might happen. you exaggerate when you talk</p>
<p>@saratoga37 They were asking for the last one.</p>
<p>@smarty - i put C. It was like " lodge…"</p>
<p>@sara they were asking for the 8th term where you add 2 each time. I believe it was 16</p>
<p>@Woodjew. I put 90. There was 540 people and 2/3 were adults. and then 1/2 of the remaining were children older than 2. so 2 or younger had to be 90 people. Because 540 * 1/6 is 90.</p>
<p>@Wood it was 90. It said that 540 were present. Two thirds were adults. 180 remaining. HALF of those were children 2 and older. Thus making 90 older than 2 and 90 younger than 2.</p>
<p>@woodjew: i got 90
2/3 were adults (360)
half of the remaining (180) were 2 or younger=90</p>
<p>Those CB guys don’t want a lawsuit on their hands. In all reality, inhospitable (don’t mean to dwell on that one question) was way too extreme for the second description in the sentence. “Menacing clouds” justified the use of inhospitable but the sudden drop was nowhere near as dramatic or “dark” (in terms of word choice) as the “menacing clouds.” ALSO, that statement is truly counterintuitive. The arrival of storms and drop in temperature does not directly constitute an inhospitable environment.</p>