<p>will I be in the 700s still with 5 missed on CR?</p>
<p>I think I got 800 math and 800 writing
but I just suck at reading comprehension.</p>
<p>To all who put 25/9, you are wrong. </p>
<p>Problem: There are two circles with center at O. One has radius 3. The circle is drawn so that OA is 3 and OC is larger. The distance from AC is 5. This means that the radius of the larger circle is 8 and the smaller is 3. Ratio of AREAS is 64pi/9pi.</p>
<p>-7, 7 average product sum question anybody? I got 0. </p>
<p>And did anybody get a Writing paragraph improvement passage about carrots?</p>
<p>the one with 2^x * 4^x or something like that turned out to be something like 2^5x right? and did anyone get 5 for the f(3)-f(2) f(x)=x^2+4 question??</p>
<p>@ArmedbyKnowledge I think I accidentally put -12 instead of 12 in also! (even though I knew how to do it)
I’m so mad at myself</p>
<p>for the pine tree question,
I forget the exact wording, all I know is that the correct answer is the one that has the pine tree as the subject
(the actual pine tree, not its needles)</p>
<p>@Saratoga!</p>
<p>That is hilarious and awesome!</p>
<p>What were everyone’s examples for the SAT essay?? What prompt did you get? I got the one about being content.</p>
<p>@cloverleaf96
it was 2^5x
it was 5</p>
<p>the question with the smallest value of two numbers divided did it say the numbers must be integers?</p>
<p>@jug Yeah. It was the pine tree as the subject one. I think that was the original?</p>
<p>Ryan zero is correct</p>
<p>Yeah guys, grammar really is formulaic. Anyway, what was the experimental writing section? We’ve all gotten word about the exp. CR and M sects but no one has said anything about the exp. writing one</p>
<p>for the passage question why can’t it be hypothetical reasoning? that makes the most sense.</p>
<p>@jeffisaboss yes it did, which is why only 1 worked</p>
<p>That math section seemed pretty easy, what would -1 be?</p>
<p>I have no idea if I put 12 or -12 but it doesn’t matter because I had time to check over all the math problems three times and whatever I put in made sense.
That said, I think I put 12.</p>
<p>@Harrovain</p>
<p>yeah you’re right. It was the original.
For the river flowing serenely one, was that no error?
I said no error.</p>
<p>@saratoga37 ok i guessed 7m anyways
im pretty sure that was our experimental section though</p>
<p>At a minimum -1 is 770</p>