<p>It can’t be III only…it’s none. they didn’t give enough information.</p>
<p>“a” could always = 2 for all we know. SAT would know this. In math practice tests, there are never qualifications to the answers… Only in the CR section.</p>
<p>@tenisgirl3232 I put “a cannot be 2”, I think this is III only. I understand there is some ambiguity as to whether there is a relationship between a and b but personally I think the “if-then” relationship is pretty obvious. Even if people disagree with this justification, just think about what the test-makers are testing and “a cannot be 2” makes more sense.</p>
<p>@sourapple. i remember one of the choices was ferment. if that helps…
i don’t remember mercurial or obstrusive either</p>
<p>@dchenfire I put suitability as the answer. Mercurial was either the question before or after the one with “officious”. I don’t remember obtrusive though. I had a writing experimental.</p>
<p>The question with the answer “mercurial” was the one that said a guy needed to adapt to these changing times or something. Sorry I don’t remember clearly :(</p>
<p>interesting… I knew all of the vocab except for atavism q… and i don’t remember those answers. Maybe they were too insignficant to remember. Talking about mercurial and obtrusive</p>
<p>To clear up this if a=2, then b=3 question, look at this illustration of if-then statements.</p>
<p>If a polygon is regular, then it has all sides equal.
A = polygon is regular; B = has all sides equal
If B is changed to has no sides equal, the polygon must not be regular. So, a must no be two. This makes sense in my head, let me know if you agree or disagree with the logic.</p>
<p>@strom 23, I think none makes much more sense… Math is my strength (as opposed to the CR section). I’ve gotten an 800 in math the last two SAT’s and an 800 in the math level 2 subject test too if that helps.</p>
<p>pretty sure III only… @sour Also, did you mark 29 as an error. In other words, is “and so gave” an error by being too colloquial/run-on?</p>
<p>And did you have three no errors? (penguins (flightless birds), lexicographers, and Jane Goodall)</p>
<p>@sour… same qualifications… pretty sure its testing mathematical logic (like from geometry), was testing that you knew truth value of contrapositive was equivalent to truth value of original</p>
<p>@sour, math is my strength too. same stats as u plus 3 on the aime, 80 on the psat math, and 5 on bc and stat if that helps too. i got III only d:</p>
<p>and i got suitable as well.</p>
<p>i think obtrusive mightve been experimental. it was describing this person who kept on interfering with everything. maladroit was another answer choice.</p>
<p>lol lets not brag about math qualifications… pretty sure its capacity, reread article?</p>
<p>Well, I guess only time will tell… you guys do make a good point, but I’m just going to hold onto my answer haha.</p>
<p>lol dchen, i was making a joke in response to sour. do you have the article? the amazon page doesnt show the article.</p>
<p>I got that “she had a capacity for friends”
and for the a = 2 b = 3 question I got none</p>
<p>amazon, you have to click on the view article. like click on the book cover. its like pg. 17-18.</p>
<p>Does any one know the exact wording for the flightless penguin? I ask this because I know that “in THE absence of” should be the right answer, and I think I put D or something as the answer (really don’t remember).“In THE absence of” was one of the changes right (as in not no error)?</p>
<p>@monepo interesting, someone else said the same thing… Did I really read too fast? I was pretty sure it had the article. Are you sure it didn’t? Also, I’m pretty sure D was underlining evolved in, not evolved in absence… Do you remember?</p>
<p>haha sorry i don’t remember. Mental note to myself to remember the number of no errors I got next time :P</p>