Official US November SAT Discussion II (Test with Negative Campaigns)

Test Preparation SAT Preparation
121

<p>@spark
i do remember the fraction 5/21, maybe they just swapped the 2 and 1 on accident</p>

122

<p>@Mushookie</p>

<p>it was 1980</p>

123

<p>@mushookie 15 years.
@thecontender I put 0 o.o cause in the chart it was like
x f(x) g(x)
1 2 0
for one of the values.
@sparkfor 1.</p>

124

<p>@f1yin; how many math sections did you have?</p>

125

<p>Oh okay that makes sense. Sweet got it.</p>

126

<p>@thecountender</p>

<p>when x = 1 f(x) = 2 which follows the f(a) = a+1
so g(a) = g(1) = 0 i think…</p>

127

<ol>
<li>I had the experimental reading =.=
But I have no idea which one was the experimental one, sadly.</li>
</ol>

128

<p>That was hard…</p>

129

<p>How many books did the poet sell?</p>

130

<p>@morton fraction so 1/2 or .5 would’ve been acceptable
@iwattostudy 200</p>

131

<p>@iwanttostudy</p>

<p>190??</p>

132

<p>I originally thought my math was experimental… because i thought that problems with k and logicality do not appear on SAT… but looks like i got something else…</p>

133

<p>I got like ~200 sth for the book one…</p>

134

<p>@f1yin9hi9h I remember a note that said to omit the percent sign</p>

135

<p>@f1yin9hi9h</p>

<p>why was it 200? could you please explain. It was like 410 people bought book from two authers. 40 of them bought books from both. and auther 1 had 50 more books sold then the poet.</p>

136

<p>@morton I remember it saying what fraction of test takers who scored above 10 on the second test scored below 40 the first time or something like that.</p>

137

<p>there was a note about omitting some sign, but i dont think it was for that prob</p>

138

<p>@f1yin9hi9h dammit…</p>

139

<p>410 bought books.
40 bought 2… others bought 1…</p>

<p>A = 50+P
40<em>2 + (410-40)</em>1 = A+P</p>

140

<p>SirDan I had all those except the African American buying land, I think.</p>