oh my god, i just found the perfect rebuttal to evolution

College Confidential Community
21

<p>

</p>

<p>Touche! 10 char</p>

22

<p>this thread should have been devoted to the progress of the PAFFLE! because it has not been devoted to the progress of the paffle, it is a waste.</p>

23

<p>

You also can’t build something out of nothing.</p>

24

<p>^ Yes you can.</p>

25

<p>That’s not a valid rebuttal because there are always coupled reactions! Thus, you could use several exergonic reactions to power an endergonic one. This would also work with reactions in which order is increased.</p>

26

<p>I was going to respond seriously but then realized this thread is a joke.</p>

27

<p>I’m going to play the average CC nerd here.</p>

<p>Excuse me, but…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…</p>

<p>Don’t babies come from 2 cells? A sperm and an egg, or more correctly, a sperm and an ovum.</p>

<p>Your biology teacher should be fired. I would throw my pocket protector at him if he told me babies come from one cell.</p>

28

<p>

</p>

<p>But when sperm fertilizes egg, they merge into one cell.</p>

<p>In fact, it could be said that eggs are not 100% penetrated by a single sperm - some are penetrated by multiple sperm</p>

<p>==
besides i never took a biology class. i self-studied ap biology and got a 5</p>

29

<p>

</p>

<p>No, they aren’t.</p>

30

<p>

</p>

<p>Wrong. Eggs can be penetrated by multiple sperm. The resulting zygote is just inviable - that’s all. :p</p>

31

<p>ALSO WRONG. Once an egg is penetrated by ONE sperm, it modifies itself so other sperm cannot penetrate it.</p>

32

<p>

</p>

<p>Incorrect rebuttal.</p>

<p>In MOST cases, eggs penetrated by ONE sperm modify themselves.</p>

<p>However, this does not speak for ALL cases.</p>

<p>In some cases, the eggs fail to modify themselves. In this case, multiple sperm penetrate and the zygote is inviable.</p>

<p>Owned. :)</p>

33

<p>do chicken eggs have sperm in them? like the ones that you eat from the supermarket? and if no then why would the chicken just make an egg? and how does the sperm get into the chicken egg like how would it pass through the shell? or is it really a baby chicken inside of the egg?</p>

34

<p>I think OP may have come from one of those egg cells that had two sperm cells, lol</p>

35

<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=259353[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=259353&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>HOLY CRAP.</p>

<p>THIS IS JUST SO FUNNYY</p>

<p>Yuan Shao, why the switch from evolution to creationism?</p>

36

<p>man this is interesting
<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfecundation[/url]”>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfecundation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

37

<p>

</p>

<p>What up, dog? I T-Smack, das right, hollaback. I gots da brudda Alvin in da house t’night, gonna be… What dat? Yeah, he white. Yeah, I black. Wha’? Ya wanna know why? Cuz… yo momma KINKY!!!</p>

<p>Sorry. That’s what happens before sunrise.</p>

38

<p>A joke thread progressing into an argument on biology? Only on CC.</p>

39

<p>

</p>

<p>The chicken eggs you buy at supermarkets don’t have sperm in them, because they were never fertilized. I forgot why the chicken lays eggs even if they weren’t fertilized.</p>

40

<p>a lot of animals have parthenogenesis (egg development w/o fertilization)… but i’m not sure if that’s the explanation for chickens…</p>

<p>as for evolution, it’s ridiculous to deny it because we see it occurring every single day…</p>