<p>
</p>
<p>Not yet. The indictment was handed down one month ago, on February 13, 2007 – the day before Lam left office. Her position has not been filled, so the prosecution is probably in limbo at this point.</p>
<p>Ah, my birthday! 
(that must make me a 911 suspect…)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I don’t think we know, yet. For example, if Wilkes the defense contractor was paying the #3 at CIA to award contracts, how much was he paying officials at Justice and the White House to get rid of the prosecutor and derail the investigation?</p>
<p>It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that future indictments, if any, would likely hinge on lying under oath to a congressional committee, destruction of subpeonad documents, etc. That’s why Fielding isn’t about to let Rove or Meiers testify under oath or with an an available transcript.</p>
<p>If they didn’t do anything illegal, there’s no reason for Miers or Rove to fear testifying under oath, right? So let them testify under oath, and we’ll see if there is a crime. Like Tony Snow said, they are just using Executive Privilege to avoid accountability. </p>
<p>Ah, Republican crows coming home to roost.</p>