<p>there were 2 or 3 versions. Indeed an unusual amount.</p>
<p>But, the lobster version was simple. from what i’ve seen the other test was much harder</p>
<p>I had the lobster one too!!!..but i screwed up big time on the SC…>_<</p>
<p>Umm, am I the only one that got 6 “no mistakes” on the writing section? I had the one where the paragraph was about studying in gropus rather than alone.</p>
<p>There were 5, I think…</p>
<p>I thought “to build at the center of Washington DC” was “to build in the center”, but I’m wrong. The one with unseasonably had no error either.</p>
<p>it was harder than oct in every aspect, good thing i only needed to improve writing</p>
<p>whatiscollegeok…
- build at the center is right
- it’ s unseasonable…not unseasonably…i think…cuz it was modifying a noun…the weather/climate…or something</p>
<p>man it sounds like this lobster/minnesota one was really easy</p>
<p>I got a totally different one</p>
<p>Were "prudent"and “cacophonous” answers on the sentence completion?</p>
<p>koreanhalfbreed, i think i got those. not sure</p>
<p>I remember prudent. Don’t remember cacophonous</p>
<p>dude who takes the SAT 5 times(aside from u)?</p>
<p>only 2000/1.5 million seniors take the SAT 5+ times</p>
<p>You should get certification for that.</p>
<p>thats funny</p>
<p>the shakespeare version is easy…easier than Nov SAT</p>
<p>btw on the lobster test, i think that the sentence completions were ridiculously hard. the hardest sentence completions on any SAT (or Practice SAT) ive ever taken.</p>
<p>i found the lobster S/C very simple. </p>
<p>easiest ive encountered so far</p>
<p>yea… i got the lobster test and the sentence completions were very hard. but i guess the passages werent that bad</p>
<p>I found the writing OK, but the CR and Math crazily, obscurely, outrageously difficult!!!</p>
<p>It was average imo</p>
<p>I got the Shaw/Shakespeare version and found it easier than whatever I got in October (retaking a mediocre 790w/700m/700r). I blew an 800 in math again, though, which ticks me off.</p>