I think my problem with that article is it is kind of “common sense”…those attributes should be expected at a school significantly smaller than a research U. To draw the types they want, they need to tell more than an overview I believe and tell more specifics or things that are unique to Oxford that don’t just automatically occur because of size. For example, time to revisit this with the Discovery Seminars and any potential capstone requirements they may implement. That may serve to draw not only “default” students (interpret how you will), but also draw a greater share who may be very serious about getting an LAC style education.