<p>Wondered how long it would take for someone to bring up Jerry Fallwell. :)</p>
<p>I didn’t insert him into politics. He did that himself. :)</p>
<p>“Mini, at the end of the day, I don’t care what anyone does or does not do in their marriages, or in their choice of partners.”</p>
<p>Well, I would think it darn should. I should think it should bother you a lot that the party of family values would even consider nominating a man who conducts a steamy affair in his official residence with his wife and young daughter living there the entire time. I think it should bother you a lot that the party of family values should consider nominating a man who deserts a wife suffering from cancer to take up with another woman, and then did it AGAIN when his next wife was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. I should think the party of family values should care that such men have no respect for themselves, their spouses, their families, their constituents, and their own party. And that they would allow themselves to be so used, so these paragons of family values could pursue their own interests?</p>
<p>Respectfully, and with less tact than I’d like to say it, I think it speaks volumes about you (and others) who claim that it is Hillary (who is guilty of absolutely nothing) who is showing a lack fo self-respect. As you know, I have no truck with Hillary’s party, but where is your self-respect?</p>
<p>Aren’t you doing what Hillary “did”, only worse?</p>
<p>Bravo, Mini.</p>
<p>
In that case, I’d hate to see what you say about people you don’t actually know when you really let go!</p>
<p>Somehow I don’t think Hillary is even on Bill’s list of “sperm recepticles.” ;)</p>
<p>Mini, I think you missed the entire point of my post. Unless something really, really weird happened, and I somehow missed all the media coverage, Guliani and Newt are NOT eligible to become the first female presidents of the United States, and, far as I know, their former wives are not considering running for office. :)</p>
<p>I don’t think I missed your point in the least, other than you (and others) have shown yourself willing to sell your self-respect to male homewreckers in the party of family values, some of whom flaunted it in very public view, but have qualms about those whom have done nothing at all. Why are you so willing to allow yourself to be used?</p>
<p>I ask again: where is YOUR self-respect?</p>
<p>(I do hope Newt someday gets treatment for his displaced hypochondria; I wonder how many wounded female soldiers he’d abandon on the battlefield.)</p>
<p><a href=“http://abcnews.go.com/images/WNT/02-02-03b.pdf[/url]”>http://abcnews.go.com/images/WNT/02-02-03b.pdf</a></p>
<p>Oh.my.god.</p>
<p>Someone had to post a link that doesn’t make it past my filter and I have to do IE with its MS interogations and popups.</p>
<p>Yeah, Drew. As much hostility as ABC got for running that story, thank goodness they did, so that the other victims finally felt safe enough to come forward. </p>
<p>It’s very sad that many of the comments left by the public on the ABC webpage denounced the young man who initially came forward as warped, sick, dirty-minded, and a liberal who had obviously set up an innocent Congressman to smear him for the Democrats. Not one of those folks has posted a retraction after the latest developments, or apologized to the young man for assassinating his character or to ABC for all the horrible things they said about the network and its report.</p>
<p>Oh, come on, the liberals’ comments are just as bad…</p>
<p>Really? Some of them did say some pretty horrid things about Foley, but I didn’t see any of them saying something like this (about one of the IM victims): “[a]lmost sounds as if this kid was into it. Was he? Maybe he’s not so innocent.”</p>
<p>It’s pretty vile to use the “she or he enjoyed it” smear on a victim of sexual assault or harassment.</p>
<p>G’night, conyat.</p>
<p>
Statistically, epistrophy is correct. NPD runs 75%/25% M/F. The majority of pathological narcissists <em>ARE</em> male. That said, I had a full-count narcissist mother (displayed 9 out of 9 criteria) Incidentally, NPD runs at about 1% in the general population (pathological narcissism, not just “narcissistic tendencies,” which are displayed by a greater %age), but obviously, it runs rampant within the field of politics. That, and the entertainment industry. Both of those fields attract narcissists at an ENORMOUS rate.</p>
<p>Why resort to gender discrimination? I “vote” for term limits.</p>
<p>You have to keep an eye on folks that rant and rave about sex-related topics. Many are obsessed, some unhealthily so.</p>
<p>I was going to post a rant here but fortunately I remembered Digmedia’s Take the Pledge!</p>
<p>“Now I won’t vote for her because I don’t make it a habit of voting for the wives of mass murderers”</p>
<p>Mini, if your wife killed someone, would that make you a murderer as well?</p>
<p>No. But before I voted for me, I’d want to be darn sure that I wasn’t implicated.</p>