<p>^^Thanks, UCLA dad. He has a particular document called something like “Consular Report of a U.S. Citizen Born Abroad.” We applied for it and have been holding onto it since around age 2. Soon after he was born, we took our own birth certificates and passports, plus his, to the U.S. Consulate in Canada to get this particular document. It was hard to come by!</p>
<p>I actually want to get a second official copy for him to travel with, that is until the passport comes through (will begin to apply this very week). I understand from the Homeland Security Department site that this is the definitive “proof of U.S. citizenship” for someone born abroad (i.e., Canada). </p>
<p>He has a Canadian birth certificate, and Candian citizenship papers, but these certainly don’t indicate or mention he’s a dual citizen.</p>
<p>I might have a Catch 22, though, needing to submit the Consular letter to the passport people so he can get his first passport. Hmm. It’s going to be a busy week on the phone. Suggestions welcome, if anyone has any. Otherwise I’ll just tough it out. </p>
<p>He has a driver’s license from the State of NY, so that’s fine for government picture ID.</p>
<p>Does anyone know if I can kickstart the passport without surrendering his Consular letter proving citizenship? Or maybe I should wait until I have a duplicate consular letter before initiating the passport process.</p>
<p>And I heartily agree he should have a U.S. passport now that he’s a college freshman, even with no specifric travel plans yet. Opportunities will hopefully come his way and I want him to be ready. </p>
<p>Another reason, much like in So.Cal: soon these rules will change at the borders of Canada and Mexico. I believe I read about changes here starting Jan. 2008. Even just to drive over and visit Niagara Falls on the Canadian side, soemthing we often do here, will soon require a passport, or some other lesser document. Right now the US government’s trying to figure it out. When they first announced it, the business community on both sides of this border objected that it would wreck them, because they depend on a cross-border marketplace for this regional economy. It was also argued that if a family in upstate NY (or upstate anwhere on the border) wants to take a family picnic in Canada, it’s rough to have to buy an entire family with children passports just for that kind of travel. So there could be more limited documents than a passport, just for nearby travel. Our U.S. Senators (Shumer and Clinton) are working on that now. Oviously, the counter-argument is that national security is of vital concern, not just the regional economy. Hopefully they can protect both. There’s a corridor from Buffalo to Hamilton and Toronto that is a functioning economic region.</p>