<p>I’m disappointed that they’re removing the analogies. I always got all of them right.
Something about cultural fairness.</p>
<p>“cultural fairness.”?</p>
<p>LOL, is this about that minority/culural background thing they were talking about? Where some of the analogies are part of American culture and some students weren’t exposed to that?</p>
<p>LOL, it’s “kind of” bullsh!t because it means you probably haven’t learned enough…but still, i remember one question a LOONNNGG time back that I had no idea what the correlation was.</p>
<p>You know - it’s not fair to ask Asians to do analogies using Latin roots, etc.</p>
<p>o well i dont think it really matters. cus asians still seem to get top scores…</p>
<p>1580, fourth try. I just kept taking the test until I did not make any stupid mistakes. Most of the time, small errors are the sole reason behind a 1450 versus a 1580. I did study for my first test but after that it was merely luck of the draw.</p>
<p>Kidding? I love critical reading, that’s the only section that has any use in life. No one actually uses SAT vocabulary, studying that is a waste of time in my opinion.</p>
<p>Of course, I’m also no 1600. There are simply more important things to spend my time on…</p>
<p>1600, but take it from someone who knows… its really all luck. i didnt really study for it, but ive had a history of doing well on standardized tests and not being geniusy in school or anything. </p>
<p>to recommend anything, itd be to work on the things that are easiest for u so u dont make any careless errors. i know for the sat2 writing, which is gonna become part of the new sat, just memorizing the 10 types of grammar questions in the first part really help your score. also, learn when to skip and when not to. i know they always say to just guess if you can eliminate one or something, but it really depends on what youre aiming for. if your score is already pretty high, then strategic blank-leaving can help more.</p>
<p>10 types?</p>
<hr>