<p>Yeah, that would be nice. Not going to happen, though. I don’t think Chicago even tries to track stuff like that – certainly not in any regular, transparent way.</p>
<p>In any event, it would be awfully hard to compare the two schools’ reports, even if Chicago had one, because the student bodies are so different. Probably a third to half of the Chicago student body has the skills and inclination to do what MIT students do, but either they failed to get admission to MIT or affirmatively chose Chicago with its much greater emphasis on well-roundedness and impracticality (and, yes, I know MIT students are plenty well-rounded). And the rest of the Chicago students are completely non-tech. Meanwhile, many/most of the MIT students have been getting practical engineering training that (a) has immediate value in the marketplace at graduation, and (b) is completely unavailable at Chicago. </p>
<p>So the question can’t be “Which college’s graduates get better, higher-paying first jobs?” It’s “How badly does MIT beat Chicago, and is there some identifiable subset of students at either college that can be compared in a meaningful way?”</p>