Post Your essay

<p>I applied EA, so I guess here’s my essay…</p>

<p>Option 6: Where’s Waldo?</p>

<p>So where is Waldo, really? Children, teenagers, and adults alike struggle to answer this question, staring endlessly at illustrations of packed beaches, crowded towns, and congested malls. I admit: I, too, belong in this group. While my eyes light up at the approach of a fresh challenge, they tire after a few minutes, tear up after about five, and burn with frustration at the seemingly infinite number of figures obstructing the discovery of Waldo. Thus, I decided to take a new approach. I gave my fatigued eyes a break and sought not the solution to my problem but the cause of my frustration.
The search for Waldo is difficult not because he is camouflaged in a corner, but because, on that very same beach, there are dozens of possible Waldos, tricking our eyes and taking advantage of our tendency to stereotype.
Anyone who knows of this Waldo in question can describe him to you: red and white striped hat and sweater, blue jeans, black hair, and round glasses. Just as anyone speaking Spanish is “Mexican,” and people with big noses and dark hair are labeled “Jews,” this description creates a template we name “Waldo.” We know how Waldo dresses and how he accessorizes, but that’s all. If we identify Waldo solely by his clothes, hair color, and eyewear, aren’t there millions of Waldos out there, roaming the world in their striped sweaters?
And thus, the challenge begins. Within the pictures, red and white sweaters, hats, and round glasses are thrown about on various people. A blonde woman might be wearing a Waldo-esque sweater, and for a second, our minds perceive her to be Waldo. Another dark-haired man could be wearing a hat similar to Waldo’s, and we believe we have completed the challenge until we see his yellow shirt. In our frustration, we might deceive ourselves and take the easy way out, convincing ourselves that another man wearing Waldo’s clothes had simply forgotten to put on his glasses that morning. However, we use the man’s sweater as an identifier of Waldo, just as some see my eyes and automatically assume I am Chinese (which, although is correct, remains a stereotypical assumption). Our brains utilize faulty reasoning to make these conclusions and give our minds a simple way to identify and classify others: Chinese people have slanted eyes; Victoria has slanted eyes; therefore, she is Chinese. Likewise, we attempt to find Waldo in this manner: Waldo wears a red and white striped sweater; this man is wearing a red and white striped sweater; therefore, this man is Waldo. But he isn’t.
Now that I have presented this problem in our methods of finding Waldo, a solution is presumed to follow. However, a solution is unnecessary. Stereotyping is an impulse that we cannot control: it is an instinctual function of our brain – an attempt at creating order through categorization. The only method of minimizing judgment is the repression of such assumptions, and as we do so, we begin breaking down the barrier that inhibits our discovery of Waldo. Fortunately, our determination and resilience in our search for Waldo suggests progression past these initial stereotypes as we continue our attempt at finding a man who encompasses not one, but all the qualities of “Waldo.” As we dismiss each phony “Waldo,” we are one step closer to finding the real one. The longer the search, the more likely we are to find him. Thus, we repress our assumptions, and our search continues.
To answer your question: I have no idea where Waldo could be. Every now and then, I see someone on the street sporting a Waldo sweater or donning black, round glasses, but in the end, I am still searching. Maybe I will spot Waldo on a hike through Big Bend National Park, or, hopefully, I will run into him at the University of Chicago. Either way, I will find him – Waldo cannot hide forever.</p>

<p>texvic, I really liked your essay! I hope you get in, and do find Waldo at UChicago. :D</p>

<p>enjoy your essay!</p>

<p>I want to post mine, but I think I should wait until after RD apps are in so no one takes my idea…</p>

<p>texvic,</p>

<p>the way you started your where’s waldo essay is strikingly similar to mine -_-</p>

<p>Really goes to show how difficult it is to be unique in essays :O</p>

<p>I was wondering if anyone’s be interested in reading my essay. I don’t really want to post it here, but if you’d be willing PM me, or I can PM it to you?</p>

<p>Hadiram:</p>

<p>I would love to swap essays with you. PM me?</p>

<p>Very nice essay texvic! Although I think your approach is similar to others’ approaches, your style of writing was outstanding and unique. Also, your conclusion was very smooth and implied your dedication to UChicago. I’ve chosen different essay topic of silence, but I must praise for your well-written and developed essay.</p>

<p>What would you guys say were the most “common” subjects for the arch-nemesis essay? Either something you wrote about or you know your friends wrote about…</p>

<p>I’d say a lot of people wrote about themselves being their own arch nemesis. A lot of my friends used that topic…however, each of them had a unique writing style and a different way of writing about it. It’s really hard to be COMPLETELY unique with these essays I’ve realized…</p>

<p>@Hadiram: i hope I didn’t scare you too much with my comments.</p>

<p>I agree completely with rldmsdl12 about being <em>completely</em> unique with these essays.
Funny thing, I was about to write about myself being my own arch nemesis… and then I realized that it was cliche and that I couldn’t pull it off… and then I thought of time, but after I found out two other friends were planning on writing on time, I changed my topic again.</p>

<p>I knew I wanted to do myself as my own arch nemesis, but I also knew that that would be the common and cliche approach. I stuck with the topic and instead of it being directly me vs myself, it was me vs my evil twin. I tried to take a more interesting narrative angle and not be very philosophical or personal.</p>

<p>Bleh I want to post my waldo essay but I’ll post it if I get accepted… :/</p>

<p>@snow–no worries, I’m sure there are very view topics that isn’t repeated at least once. I just wanted to see if there was a general trend for that topic. See, at my school people don’t really talk much about what they’re writing about, or even where they’re applying for that matter, but I was curious to see if other people knew.</p>

<p>Hmm, that’s why I picked the Heisenberg one. Open lane in the freeway. All of the prompts were nifty though.</p>

<p>I wrote about the arch nemesis but it was about my cat…</p>

<p>what do you mean by people writing about themselves? That’s what I did but imo it was pretty creative. Now I’m not so sure anymore…</p>

<p>And do you guys think that they’ll reward creativity over execution and writing ability?</p>

<p>Here’s my Waldo essay! I know that it is short and I could have refined it at parts, but I did write it all on the day the application was due…</p>

<p>“So where is Waldo, really?” I, too, once asked such questions. I was only a boy, with curiosity akin to that which killed the cat, and a blatant disregard for the concept of causality that likened me to Curly Howard. The combination of these vices and a constant supply of juice boxes led to the spending of nearly all of my waking hours poring over the numerous Where’s Wally books, in search of Waldo and Friends. </p>

<p>But on one cold winter night, as I was devouring Where’s Wally: Plundering Pirates, something happened that changed my life. I heard a voice. It was muffled at first, but soon it became discernible. The voice, a monotonous, matter-of-fact locution was unmistakably Waldo’s. Page seven had come alive! I was just about to slam the book shut when he addressed me by name, imploring me to hear him out. I sat dumbfounded. He must have taken my muteness as license to begin his monologue, because it was then that he started. </p>

<p>He spoke candidly about the plight of being a pawn at the fingers of unthinking prepubescent readers and their inconsiderate parents. He related what it felt like to be a perpetual fixture on the tabloid that is the Where’s Wally series. He spoke of auld lang syne, a time before his girlfriend Wenda, his dog Woof, and his wizard friend Whitebeard had become specimens on the metaphorical scanning electron microscope that is our eyes, burning away the substance, the man, behind the shallow corpse of what is left of our recreation. He went on to describe his golden years as a computer programmer working for Intel and the distant memory of listening to The Rolling Stones’ It’s Only Rock ‘n Roll. Unprompted, Waldo took a different course. He began to describe the unfortunate string of events that led to his unending punishment on the book shelves. As it turns out, Waldo and a previous girlfriend, Wilma, a narcissistic conjurer, had an argument that left them separated for weeks. Upon reuniting, Wilma had intentions to keep them together in indelible fashion. She had used a hex that resulted in Waldo and her becoming two-dimensional, inanimate characters (she made sure that they were dressed the same to satisfy her narcissistic tendencies). </p>

<p>Waldo then went on to list further grievances, but, by then, the message was clear. He was a broken man, a tragic case of lost identity and public exploitation, borne out of romance gone awry. Behind his hopeless voice was the plea to be treated with dignity, to be left with Wenda and his dog, to be left alone. This encounter left me with a poignant lesson by which my thoughts and actions have been guided for years: We are all citizens of a world that can be unfair, snooping, and utterly vile, and often times, we just need somebody to share this with. And so, to answer the original question, I would say that there is a little bit of Waldo in every one of us.</p>

<p>@Karatekid: I really like the idea of Waldo being imprisoned within the book, but I agree that your essay definitely could have been refined in a lot of places. The ending line seems especially cliche in my opinion, and your similes seem to be there just for the sake of figurative language, not really lending anything to the piece.</p>

<p>AtomicBoy: I totally agree. I doubt UC will overlook those flaws :/</p>