<p>I think we are all beginning to see, if we have not seen already, that a lot more of this sort of abuse has and does happen. That it happened within the Catholic church was just one small part of the picture. It wasn’t and isn’t just priests doing this sort of thing, and not just the Church that was not addressing the issue, sweeping it under the rug, so to speak. Not that this vindicates what happened there.</p>
<p>It is a difficult thing to address, however. There are rights that anyone so suspected has. The accusation is one that can ruin a person even if it is untrue. There have been a number of cases where accusations were levied that were false. This sort of thing can turn into a witch hunt if it is not handled v-e-r-y carefully.</p>
<p>So here is a question. Your son, your legally adult child has been named as someone who has molested a child. he adamantly denies it. Replace “son” with husband, wife, daughter, trusted friend, long time employee, neighbor, teacher, father, mother, stranger. How should these things uniformly be handled to be fair to the accused and protect others and also address the violation to a child in case the accusation is true? There is often no real proof in these situations. What standard of proof should be needed for what level of action?</p>
<p>I found out recently that a young man whom I knew when he was a child who was friends with my oldest when they were little kids up to high school was so accused while teaching. There was insufficient evidence to get a criminal case, but he is truly ruined, and there is strong sentiment there that he did not do it.What this has done to him and his family is horrendous, if he truly did not do this and there is evidence that this is the case, but …yes, it is possible he did do it. </p>
<p>In the Horace Mann situation, it is not possible to legally prove that some of these predators did indeed molest children. There are families on both sides of this. Some of the accused are not here to present their case and make their denials. How should the school handle this? What burden of proof needs to be presented for something to be done, and what should be done? What would any of us do, if faced by someone from many years ago accusing us of molestation or other deed that is unprovable and not something we can disprove either. We can only deny and point to the lack of proof. Then what if another joins in the chorus? Suppose they both are mentally ill and claim that you contributed to their condition? </p>
<p>Some years ago, a swim coach I knew was accused of inappropriately touching some young girls. The guy was a “touchy-feely” type of guy, if you know what I mean, and I do believe that he crossed the line of personal space and should not have been touching people as much as he did. And he did so in the full view of any and every one. We all knew this. Then one young girl claimed he rubbed her breast, and a chorus of other preteens joined in sort of a giggly way. A parent picked up on this and immediately raised an alert. Though nothing was legally done, he was banned from all of the schools in the area and any of the swim teams. Now 18 years later, some of the girls who had said this, have come out and said they really did not believe that what happened was more than accidental contact and what happened was an overblown reaction. My kids won’t touch other kids now when teaching swimming or much of anything, due this sort of thing, and I guess that’s the way it has to be.</p>