<p>You know something, DSC, you are right. There is a fundamental difference between the chapel and my art exhibition. Once can imagine an art exhibition without objects of any religious significance. By contrast, a chapel is INHERENTLY religious; the only question is WHICH religious symbols should be displayed, and how.</p>
<p>I think the solution ultimately adopted is entirely plausible. However, my understanding (subject to correction) is that this solution was forced upon Nichol after he attempted to remove the Wren Cross from the chapel entirely. That action smacks of the viewpoint of people such as the Ayatollah Barry Lynn who (notwithstanding his status as a Christian clergyman) seeks to use the Constitution as a bludgeon to commit government to the ideology of secular humanism.</p>