Princeton and Harvard to reinstate early admission program

[phantasmagoric]

<p>I don’t know why I wasted my time; UncleTomsCabin12 also said these gems</p>

<p>

just because someone is poor, it doesn’t give any reason to say they deserve it more than the rich kid. Just as the poor kid didn’t choose to be poor, the rich kid didn’t choose to be rich.

</p>

<p>This coming from someone who was rich enough to have private tutoring from Princeton Review and raised his SAT score 300 points.</p>

<p>

I would definitely recommend Princeton Review. As for their tests, i think they’re harder than the real thing – which is good.</p>

<p>I got private tutoring with them, heres what i got in chronological order of diagnostic tests:</p>

<p>1810
1970
2020
2120

</p>

<p>Clearly he thinks that the low-income student who got the same SAT score without private tutoring isn’t more impressive than he is. (By the way, low-income students generally can only take the SAT twice–not four times–because that’s all the fee waivers that they’ll get.)</p>

<p>Judging by his other posts he got rejected by Harvard (probably Stanford too), went to Penn, and is now trying to transfer to Harvard. Doesn’t look like that private tutoring paid off, did it? Bitter that you got rejected and are blaming low-income students? Guess what–they worked a lot harder, have more to contribute, and are more impressive than you. Deal with it.</p>