<p>tommybill, don’t back down, I have been where you are, so are correct in your assessment, btw…</p>
<p>and yes sokkermom was being deliberately deceptive</p>
<p>tommybill, don’t back down, I have been where you are, so are correct in your assessment, btw…</p>
<p>and yes sokkermom was being deliberately deceptive</p>
<p>Meanwhile:</p>
<p>““Iraqi political leaders remain unable to govern effectively,” the 10-page document, a declassified summary of a more detailed National Intelligence Estimate, concludes. A copy was obtained by The Associated Press in advance of its release Thursday.”</p>
<p>Funny - that’s what I would have written about the U.S. GOVERNMENT and political leaders, and, it seems, most Americans, of all political stripes, agree with me. :)</p>
<p>Stay the course.</p>
<p>
How can you possibly know what sokkermom’s motives were?</p>
<p>Real information on Clinton vs. Giuliani </p>
<p><a href=“http://pewresearch.org/pubs/575/clinton-giuliani[/url]”>http://pewresearch.org/pubs/575/clinton-giuliani</a></p>
<p>Didn’t see any “real information” there. </p>
<p>The reality is that both candidates will keep hostile, aggressive occupying forces in Iraq indefinitely (with neither relying on the coalition of the very small - what did happen to that fighting force from Botswana?), both favor health care approaches that will reward major health insurers and lobbyists who are their campaign contributors while yakking about “incentives”, both will try to shy away from involvement in social issues as best they can, both will continue trade policies to pollute the earth, both will likely create large task forces to “tackle immigration” (so as to keep it away from themselves as long as possible), both will build up a larger military-industrial establishment (with more money for their campaign coffers), both will carry water for Israel’s political agenda, and neither will tackle Social Security. </p>
<p>One will have bad hair days; one will have more no hair days.</p>
<p>“WASHINGTON – The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is expected to advise President Bush to reduce the U.S. force in Iraq next year by almost half…”</p>
<p><a href=“General, spy report raise Iraq stakes”>General, spy report raise Iraq stakes;
<p>
If this is what he is waiting for, it will be a long occupation.</p>
<p>"WASHINGTON – The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is expected to advise President Bush to reduce the U.S. force in Iraq next year by almost half, potentially creating a rift with top White House officials and other military commanders over the course of the war.</p>
<p>Administration and military officials say Marine Gen. Peter Pace is likely to convey concerns by the Joint Chiefs that keeping well in excess of 100,000 troops in Iraq through 2008 will severely strain the military. This assessment could collide with one being prepared by the U.S. commander in Iraq, Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, calling for the U.S. to maintain higher troop levels for 2008 and beyond."</p>
<p>Yep. Gotta listen to those generals.</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/08/24/ap4052736.html[/url]”>http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/08/24/ap4052736.html</a></p>
<p>You have to read this to believe it. $8 billion dollars of government money is completely unaccounted for in the rebuilding, and whistleblowers are severely punished by our own government. </p>
<p>One Navy sailor who gave the FBI documents about illegal arms sales to insurgents by a private contractor was held as a security detainee for over three months and subjected to harsh interrogation techniques by our own government–the government he was trying to help.</p>
<p>The advisor to a national coalition of secruity whistleblowers is now advising people who ask him NOT to come forward with information about corruption in Iraq because the damage that will be done to them and their families simply isn’t worth it.</p>
<p>I don’t think the full extent of the unbelievable graft and corruption, as well as waste and corporate benefit, from this war will ever be known. That $8B may well be a drop in the bucket.</p>
<p>We’ll definitely never know about it if we keep imprisoning the GIs and veterans who talk to the FBI about it.</p>
<p>SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico, Aug. 26, 2007 (AP)
</p>
<p>Iraq has failed to meet all but three of 18 congressionally mandated benchmarks for political and military progress, according to a draft of a Government Accountability Office report…</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/29/AR2007082902434_pf.html[/url]”>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/29/AR2007082902434_pf.html</a></p>
<p>The more interesting part is that they felt obligated to leak it before the liars and sycophants (oops, I mean Administration and the Generals; no, I’ll stay with liars and sycophants) had time to clean it up.</p>
<p>Congresswomen Jan Schakowsky’s very sober radio address:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.janschakowsky.org/SchaBLOGsky/tabid/36/ctl/ArticleView/mid/512/articleId/463/Text-of-Jans-Democratic-Radio-Response.aspx[/url]”>http://www.janschakowsky.org/SchaBLOGsky/tabid/36/ctl/ArticleView/mid/512/articleId/463/Text-of-Jans-Democratic-Radio-Response.aspx</a></p>
<p>Yup. The President touched down today to praise the success of the surge in Anbar.</p>
<p>Only one problem: there ISN’T any surge in Anbar. What they’ve done is arm tribal leaders and given them permission to hijack medical caravans to sell the meds and supplies on the black market so as to purchase more American-made weapons. Meanwhile, at the same time, we are arming Al-Qaeda.</p>
<p>I hope the Pres has lobster tortellini too, with Maliki - better than more pork in the Pork Zone. </p>
<p>Nine to ten years…</p>