<p>Re: #19, </p>
<p>It’s true, you have some ability to narrow your field to a more copacetic level, particularly as you move to the latter parts of your college career. Where you have least ability to influence it, though, is in the dorms. This can be quite important, socially maybe moreso than academically. </p>
<p>Many or most people can deal, but there are evidentally some people who have limited interest or ability in managing this, or staying long enough to get to the point where they can manage it. Over the period I’ve been on CC, if you read the comments of the people who transfer out, their dissatisfaction with the level of diversity frequently comes up as one factor. In some cases the individual would prefer less social diversity. In other cases the individuals were dissatisfied with their perception of too wide a degree of diversity in academic capabilities.</p>
<p>This aspect was demonstrably a disadvantage in the minds of those people, to the point that it was contributing to their transfer decision.</p>
<p>And I, for one, understood what they were talking about.</p>
<p>I didn’t transfer out though. Every decision involves balancing pros vs. cons. </p>
<p>And again, as I indicated a feature of the place that is a con to one person may be experienced as a pro by others. But as for this particular feature, not by everyone unfortunately.</p>
<p>So no, I wouldn’t say I overlooked something, I just see it the way I told it.</p>