<p>I’ve only been glancing at this thread, but there really is no difference in quality between contract and endowed colleges. I’m someone who took a variety of courses as a CAS student across a variety of disciplines. If anything, I’d always say Engineering students on average stood out as a cut above the rest in terms of intelligence/work ethic, but that’s a very broad/mostly useless generalization. A major-to-major comparison is more useful because all majors are NOT created equal in terms of rigor. Some do require less work and less intelligence to do well in.</p>
<p>In terms of careers, I agree with applejack that Cornell’s wide variety of disciplines means people choose a variety of careers. I graduated with a degree in Economics and Government, with minors in International Relations and German. Yes, I could go the I-banking route, which I used to think would have been harder for me because the Econ/CS or Econ/Math students took more relevant courses, but a fair amount of my friends who studied just Government got into I-banking as well (and if you tried to talk Econ with them, they were pathetic). If you are taking a more unconventional academic route to these jobs, internships become hugely important. </p>
<p>Of the people I knew best at Cornell, those who struck me as most intelligent are either doing something academic (grad school, research fellowship, etc.) or doing nonprofit work for something they care about. The people I knew of “average” intelligence at Cornell (keeping in mind average at Cornell is still well above average overall), are more likely in finance/banking. I base this off personal experience and I’m not sure if they publish stats about GPA and future jobs. Of people I knew really well, only 1 of my “highly” intelligent friends is in banking, whereas several of my “average” intelligence friends are doing finance/banking.</p>
<p>I never applied to the Econ major with the intention of going into banking/finance, and now that I’ve graduated, my only motivation for that type of job would be envy of the money they make, which is not enough motivation for me to seriously pursue those jobs. I never applied to any sort of finance/investment job and am perfectly happy making less money doing serious research for a nonprofit. And as far as I can tell, research positions at nonprofits are at least as competitive because there are so few jobs available. I work at a fairly large organization by policy research standards, and there isn’t anyone else even in their 20s working as a research analyst here (and even then, only a handful in their 30s). I’d say Cornell gave me an edge…So there are many careers someone can pursue after Cornell, and not everyone is looking in fields with the highest paycheck. </p>
<p>I don’t mean to sound as some righteous person either who rails against finance. I deeply respect finance and I would have no problem working on Wall Street if that type of work is actually what interested me most. I took Financial Economics and I find finance fascinating, but I find research even more fascinating so that’s what I do…</p>
<p>PS. Before anyone who follows my advice calls me out for my advocacy of Econ/Math, AEM + math, etc. and now saying it doesn’t matter, please realize I always make the assumption of “all else equal” and I stand by that advice in terms of pure academic prep for these types of careers.</p>