<p>so, what was that disparaging/charitable question?</p>
<p>@xfocus</p>
<p>omg, same here. i brought like two tissue boxes to the testing room, cuz my nose wouldn’t stop running.</p>
<p>Darn, there goes my perfect score in math! And for a stupid mistake…</p>
<p>What was the question for the ‘unexpected’ answer</p>
<p>Why wouldn’t iso triangle be similar? You could get angle angle theorem by bringing down the altitude?</p>
<p>It was about the critic who had a carping attitude. he wanted to be disparaging (insulting) but his tone in one of his criticisms came off as charitable, not keeping with his usual carping attidude. hope that helps :)</p>
<p>For the writing, it is continue, not continues, because it is in subjective tense (it is IMPERATIVE).</p>
<p>iso triangle would NOT be similar in ALL cases. consider this scenario:</p>
<p>5, 5, 4 triangle
5, 5, 3 triangle </p>
<p>not similar</p>
<p>son of a ***** RAGE QUIT</p>
<p>What was the one in writing it was like not on… but on… i chose not on… and i put contrasting for socrates. you can’t assume that he’s going to proceed to these people?</p>
<p>thanks for the reply , but does anyone know the other answer choices to the disparaging/charitable question - i cant remember what i put?</p>
<p>what was the full question?</p>
<p>I lost the game. My estimated score is 190-ish</p>
<p>i fked up hard…</p>
<p>It was about the critic who had a carping attitude. he wanted to be disparaging (insulting) but his tone in one of his criticisms came off as charitable, not keeping with his usual carping attidude. hope that helps</p>
<p>Math, answers to the grid in:
7 (pizza)
12
14
4500 (books on sale)
1/3 (area of trangle w/ base 1 and height 2/3)
2 (z=45x-60y)
3/7 (6n and 8n)
63 (direct variation)
5.5 (any decimal between 5 and 6, not inclusive)
720 (photos)</p>
<p>Math multiple choice:
only equilateral triangle would be similar in all cases
intersection TWO times</p>
<p>CR:
SC:
punctilious,
conciliatory,
respectful,
sanguine,
cerebral/visceral,
disparaging/charitable</p>
<p>Indian parents:
feeling to fact,
impressive status (parents looming on the grass or something)
verbal representative,</p>
<p>City passage
dramatic voice
coined term? (can someone please confirm)</p>
<p>TV
reality television has good qualities depite perceived flaws
reality television recognizes individuality instead of emphasizing individual failures
Passage one is talking about reality tv in the present times while passage two is talking about tv in the future.
antisocial kids</p>
<p>GM plants:</p>
<p>both authors would agree that activism has had an impact on the debate over GM plants
destroying credibility,
courses through=runs through
passage one in the first paragrpah is introducing the views and actions of an idividual
pasage two is criticizing the tactics on one group while passage one is elaborating on the actions and beliefs of an idividual from that group
passage two views the action of the lady in passage one: disapproving</p>
<p>Socrates:
surrounded by sympathizers,
unexpected,
how to proceed
repecting tone</p>
<p>Writing:
D) continue
were she to be,
help turn
had flew (is wrong; should be had FLOWN)
suggests otherwise</p>
<p>I believe there were two no errors in the spot the error question?</p>
<p>Apparently no one thought the Homo Urbanus satirized recent human behavior…</p>
<p>what was the answer to the founding fathers one in the W? i was conflicted between could be and could have been able to be. it had a past participle that confused me like had wanted. i think i chose the latter though but a lot of my friends chose the first.</p>
<p>i put could be, cuz the others are REALLY wordy</p>
<p>reality television recognizes individuality instead of emphasizing individual failures</p>
<p>what was the question for that?</p>