<p>Y’know, I was one of those “CC kids” and I graduated in four years no sweat.</p>
<p>Oh, and I don’t know where Davis gets that figure. UCLA is at least above 65%…</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.today.ucla.edu/2005/051213news_studentspick.html[/url]”>http://www.today.ucla.edu/2005/051213news_studentspick.html</a></p>
<p>It’s 67%, actually.</p>
<p>And yes, the transfer 4-year-graduation rate isn’t spectacular. But keep in mind that transfers aren’t this uniformly bad lot as you suggest. Most transfers I encountered while at UCLA were excellent students and indistinguishable from their high school-entrant counterparts.</p>
<p>However, for many of them, especially science majors, transferring poses a bit of a challenge for four year graduation rates-- and it’s not because of the lack of available courses. It’s labs.</p>
<p>But what do I know? I’m just a ■■■■■■■■ transfer. Durrrr…</p>