Questionable administrative priorities?

<p>flying pig:
dont worry, I’m not condoning eclectic’s behavior. I was just trying to provide a rationale of why eclectic defenders may think its ok, and you appropriately shot it down. I dont see why eclectic should be exempt from punishment. there are rules to be followed.</p>

<p>I wont be signing the petition until I know exactly why this occurred. if I never find out, or if the punishment does fit the crime, eclectic does not get my pity.</p>

<p>apparently the noise complaints were just the icing on the cake, so apparently eclectic was in more trouble than just noise complaints. </p>

<p>whether the punishment is appropriate is up for discussion, but it is apparent they did more than one thing wrong that led to this occurring</p>