Rank the Cheerleaders

<p>Come on guys, we need a variety :wink: I know how you guys love USC, but what about some others?</p>

<p>USC students = Wealth= access to beauty products = beauty?</p>

<p>I don’t think that’s the whole of it.</p>

<p>Lots of universities have many wealthy students. The more well-ranked a private school is, the more possiblity for a wealthier student body. It’s not fair, of course, but wealthy students in general are better prepared for academic things like the SAT, or they have better quality extracurriculars at their better high schools (often private). Legacies are also important. That’s why the Ivies-- especially places like Harvard, Yale and Princeton-- have a lot of wealthy students in comparison to a small percentage of lower-income students.</p>

<p>UCLA, for example, though it’s a public school, has many wealthy students. <a href=“http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/db/issues/99/09.27/news.students.html[/url]”>http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/db/issues/99/09.27/news.students.html&lt;/a&gt; (If you don’t want to sift through the article, the avg Bruin’s family income is in the upper 70,000s and seven percent of UCLA students have families making over 200,00 a year.) </p>

<p>The “U$C” stereotype is old and completely unoriginial. A large amount of USC students are very low income. But of course, no one who was already disciminating towards USC would dare acknowledge that.</p>

<p>Anyway, to the main point: All the schools I previously mentioned (and many other schools in general) have a large (if not majority) group of wealthy students. But are their cheerleaders vaunted like USC’s? </p>

<p>No. It’s partly because they often don’t have sports programs as nice as USC’s, either. So 1. USC students aren’t richer than anyone else 2. Even if some do have money, that shouldn’t be used to explain away their cheerleaders’ looks.</p>

<p>Maybe USC cheerleaders just really are some of the best and very good-looking, and it doesn’t necessarily have to do with money.</p>

<p>“I know how you guys love USC, but what about some others?”</p>

<p>Sure, I agree. If people can find some good cheerleaders and find good pictures, than please do so.</p>

<p>And like I’ve said in previous posts, it’s not just USC cheerleaders that are great. I’ve also complimented Berk and UCLA and U of Miami cheerleaders (as well as UGA cheerleaders in one post, though I don’t think Chia noticed). But I see no one decided they wanted to post links.</p>

<p>Maybe because they can’t find any. </p>

<p>More Song Girls!</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.trojantalk.com/images/2004-2005/02-10-2005-mbball-usc-76-arizona-88/photos/IMG_7593.JPG[/url]”>http://www.trojantalk.com/images/2004-2005/02-10-2005-mbball-usc-76-arizona-88/photos/IMG_7593.JPG&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p><a href=“http://www.trojantalk.com/images/2004-2005/01-29-2005-mbball-usc-69-ucla-72/photos/IMG_6769.JPG[/url]”>http://www.trojantalk.com/images/2004-2005/01-29-2005-mbball-usc-69-ucla-72/photos/IMG_6769.JPG&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p><a href=“http://www.trojantalk.com/images/2004-2005/01-20-2005-mbball-usc-83-cal-66/photos/IMG_5232.JPG[/url]”>http://www.trojantalk.com/images/2004-2005/01-20-2005-mbball-usc-83-cal-66/photos/IMG_5232.JPG&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;