<p>
</p>
<p>Correct, but note the “affiliated colleges” segment of UC. The San Fran complex was part of those “affiliated colleges.”</p>
<p>^ Blue, straight from UCSF history website: “The three Affiliated Colleges — also called UC departments”…</p>
<p>I don’t know the source of your info…wikipedia? Haha!</p>
<p>
UC had enough control to add a dental college.</p>
<p>When i graduate, should i change my username to UCBPhilGrad, you know, since i’m basically a Berkeley student :p</p>
<p>^ everyone has dreams I guess… :)</p>
<p>Like I said, we’ll have to agree to disagree. My reading of the UCSF website leads me to a different conclusion.</p>
<p>But don’t forget, in ~1900 UC had the opportunity to officially merge Cal and the SF medical complex and get paid by the Rockefeller Foundation, but chose not to. (source: UCSF website)</p>
<p>^ Not officially merge, blue. They were required to relocate the campus to Berkeley. I guess UC Regents didn’t think the donation was big enough to warrant money being spent to relocate the medical school to Berkeley. </p>
<p>UC still had control of the medical campuses. Why would it have built an “identity as Cal’s medical center” (source: UCSF website) if it didn’t?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>And what about UC Hastings?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>And it was first to 100 NCAA championships*. What’s not to like?</p>
<p>*separately run</p>
<p>
<em>shrugs</em> Not governed by Regents?</p>
<p>
I wonder how UCLA has done billion times better than UCB in athletics.</p>
<p>Better athletic department culture for most of the 60s-00s.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>There’s also the accelerated med program at Penn State where the undergrad degree is awarded by PSU and the med degree by Jefferson.</p>